Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tanya Rudberg Selin

dblp:432/9962 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-8872-8246ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Health and well-being technologies · 77% Design research and methods · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods › qualitative analysis
reflexive thematic analysis
0.312026
"Chasing Shadows": Understanding Personal Data Externalization and Self-Tracking for Neurodivergent Individuals · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workshop · 1.0reflexive thematic analysis · 1.0qualitative study · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 "Chasing Shadows": Understanding Personal Data Externalization and Self-Tracking for Neurodivergent Individuals
abstract
We examine how neurodivergent individuals experience creating, interacting with, and reflecting on personal data about masking. Although self-tracking is often framed as enabling self-insight, this is rarely our experience as neurodivergent individuals and researchers. To better understand this disconnect, we conducted a two-phase qualitative study. First, a workshop where six participants with autism and/or ADHD crafted visual representations of masking experiences. Then, three participants continued by designing and using personalized self-tracking focused on unmasking over two weeks. Using reflexive thematic analysis of activities and interviews, we find that self-tracking imposes substantial interpretive and emotional demands, shaped by context-dependencies that challenge assumptions in self-tracking. We also find that facilitated sharing of experiences might validate emotional responses and support reflection. We identify three emotional dimensions that shape engagement with personal data in a working model of emotion in self-tracking, and discuss implications for designing self-tracking and reflective practices that incorporate peer support and better account for context and emotional labor.
Tanya Rudberg Selin, Danielle Unéus, Søren Knudsen
CHI1