Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Océane Lissillour

dblp:433/1682 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-6456-8082ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Games and playful interaction · 44% Health and well-being technologies · 44% Design research and methods · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Games and playful interaction
gamification
1.012026
What's the Point? How Users Functionalise Points in Gamified Systems · CHI 2026
Health and well-being technologies
personal informatics
1.012026
What's the Point? How Users Functionalise Points in Gamified Systems · CHI 2026
Design research and methods › qualitative analysis
reflexive thematic analysis
0.312026
What's the Point? How Users Functionalise Points in Gamified Systems · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-structured interviews · 1.0reflexive thematic analysis · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 What's the Point? How Users Functionalise Points in Gamified Systems
abstract
Points are widely used design elements in gamified systems. Yet how they motivate is still unclear: what motivational meaning or functional significance do users ascribe to points and when? To answer this question, we conducted a semi-structured interview study with 27 users of two popular gamified platforms, Duolingo and Habitica. Through reflexive thematic analysis, we constructed six different types of functionalisation variously proposed in prior gamification and personal informatics work but often not empirically supported. We highlight the importance of functional design detail (such as points should proportionally reward effort) and derive design guidelines.
Océane Lissillour, Sebastian Deterding, Abigail Evans
CHI1