Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yamato Mogi

dblp:433/2110 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-2935-3424ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 77% Health and well-being technologies · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › interpersonal communication
self-disclosure
1.012026
Exploring the Effects of Different Chatbot Voice Identities on Self-Disclosure · CHI 2026
Health and well-being technologies › mental health technology
mental health chatbot
0.312026
Exploring the Effects of Different Chatbot Voice Identities on Self-Disclosure · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mixed-method study · 1.0interviews · 1.0in-the-wild deployment · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Exploring the Effects of Different Chatbot Voice Identities on Self-Disclosure
abstract
Self-disclosure is central to mental health, and chatbots are increasingly used to elicit it by lowering the risk of social judgment. With the rapid growth of voice-based chatbots, it is crucial to understand how their voice identity shapes self-disclosure, yet this relationship remains underexplored. We address this gap through a mixed-method study that combined a 14-day in-the-wild deployment (N = 61) with post-study interviews. Participants interacted daily with chatbots that spoke in one of three voices varying in social distance: their own, a family member’s, or a stranger’s. Findings show that chatbots using the user’s own voice were rated as more attractive and sustained deeper levels of disclosure over time. Family voice chatbots prompted reflection on interpersonal relationships, where participants reported comfort in discussing some topics but reluctance in others. Together, these findings highlight voice identity as a key design lever for steering both the amount and focus of self-disclosure.
Yamato Mogi, Wataru Akahori, Naomi Yamashita
CHI1