Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aoife Mullally
dblp:433/2376
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-8229-5952ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 67% Design research and methods · 33% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Design research and methods
design ethics |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Technology in Abortion Care: a Scoping Review on Contexts of Use, Research Methods, Ethical Considerations and Impact · CHI 2026 |
Health and well-being technologies › women's health
reproductive health technology |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Technology in Abortion Care: a Scoping Review on Contexts of Use, Research Methods, Ethical Considerations and Impact · CHI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
scoping review · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Technology in Abortion Care: a Scoping Review on Contexts of Use, Research Methods, Ethical Considerations and ImpactabstractGlobally, about 40% of women and people assigned female at birth live under laws that restrict or prohibit access to safe abortion care. Even where abortion is legal, socio-cultural stigma and health inequities hinder timely, equitable access. Technologies have been developed to support abortion seekers and providers in overcoming barriers to information, safe abortion care, and support. However, research on abortion care technologies is fragmented, spanning medical and computing publications, and lacking a consolidated understanding. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of 92 studies, examining technological applications, contexts of use, research methods, ethical considerations, and pathways to impact. This analysis informs the HCI research agenda for abortion care, highlighting future directions, and fostering reflection on design, ethics, and meaningful impact. We call on HCI researchers to move beyond telemedicine and U.S.-centric perspectives, re-politicize abortion care technologies, and consider temporality in delivering timely abortion care amid broader sociopolitical constraints. Camille Nadal, Sarah Foley, Katie A. Siek, Kellie Morrissey, Aoife Mullally |
CHI | 5 |