Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Courchesne
dblp:437/3082
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 38% Automata and formal languages · 38% Computational complexity · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed computing theory
population protocols |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Population Protocols over Ordered Agents · ICALP 2026 |
Automata and formal languages › regular languages
star-free languages |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Population Protocols over Ordered Agents · ICALP 2026 |
Computational complexity › space complexity
NSPACE |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Population Protocols over Ordered Agents · ICALP 2026 |
Computational complexity
space complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Population Protocols over Ordered Agents · ICALP 2026 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Population Protocols over Ordered AgentsabstractPopulation protocols are a distributed computation model in which a collection of anonymous, finite-state agents interact in randomly chosen pairs and update their states according to a fixed transition function. The computation is defined by the eventual stabilization of the population to a consensus that represents the output. In practice, it is natural to allow each agent to carry a unique identifier and compare it with that of another agent before interacting. We model this extension by having agents be totally ordered and interactions between two agents to be fireable only if their pair of identifiers falls in some condition set. For instance, PP[<] allows for two agents to interact only if the first one appears before the second one. We study population protocols over ordered agents PP[𝒩] where 𝒩 is a set of predicates available to restrict transition firing. We also study IO-PP[𝒩], the immediate observation fragment of PP[𝒩] where only one agent changes state per interaction. Our main result is that IO-PP[<] recognizes exactly the unambiguous star-free languages, which admits many other characterizations, such as two-variable first-order logic or two-way deterministic partially-ordered automata. We also provide a logic and an automaton model that fits in PP[<]. We further show that if the successor predicate appears in a set 𝒩 of NSPACE(n)-computable predicates, then IO-PP[𝒩] = PP[𝒩] = NSPACE(n). Finally, we investigate the problem of deciding whether a given population protocol always stabilizes to a consensus. While this problem is decidable for unordered population protocols, we show that this is undecidable already for PP[<] and IO-PP[+1], but conditionally decidable for IO-PP[<]. Michael Blondin, Michaël Cadilhac, Benjamin Courchesne, Lucie Guillou, Corto Mascle, Isa Vialard |
ICALP | 3 |