Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Congxia Wu
dblp:437/3988
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-6768-797XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program analysis › static analysis › interprocedural analysis
call graph analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ReachCheck: Compositional Library-Aware Call Graph Reachability Analysis in the IDEs · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › smart contract security
vulnerability detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | ReachCheck: Compositional Library-Aware Call Graph Reachability Analysis in the IDEs · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transitive closure · 2.0matrix multiplication · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ReachCheck: Compositional Library-Aware Call Graph Reachability Analysis in the IDEsabstractCall graph reachability analysis is essential for vulnerability detection, dependency conflict analysis, and compatibility checks. However, modern software systems, particularly those developed within integrated development environments (IDEs), often rely on third-party libraries (TPLs), which significantly increase the analysis cost. This article introduces ReachCheck, a compositional library-aware analysis for method pair reachability in the IDEs. Specifically, ReachCheck summarizes TPL reachability via offline transitive closure and integrates the summaries with application code on-demand, eliminating redundant analysis. Additionally, we use matrix representations for call graphs and employ fast matrix multiplication for transitive closure, further improving efficiency. We have implemented our approach as a prototype and evaluated it upon real-world projects. Compared to online traversal, function summary approaches and three state-of-the-art graph reachability approaches ( Ferrari , BL and BFL), ReachCheck achieves 237.75 \(\times\) , 78.55 \(\times\) , 84.86 \(\times\) , 4,369.09 \(\times\) , and 80.91 \(\times\) speedup, respectively. For downstream clients like dependency conflict detection and CVE risk detection, ReachCheck completes analysis in 0.61 and 0.35 s, yielding 537.59 \(\times\) and 519.03 \(\times\) speedup over existing techniques. Chengpeng Wang 0001, Jiafeng Huang, Congxia Wu, Rongxin Wu |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 5 |