Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Fussenegger

dblp:44/3432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.112006
Generic Object Recognition with Boosting · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
weakly supervised object recognition
0.112006
Generic Object Recognition with Boosting · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.012004
Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition · ECCV (2) 2004
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
boosting-based detection
0.012004
Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition · ECCV (2) 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

boosting · 0.1local feature descriptor · 0.1feature selection · 0.1weak hypotheses · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 A level set framework using a new incremental, robust Active Shape Model for object segmentation and tracking
Michael Fussenegger, Peter M. Roth, Horst Bischof, Rachid Deriche, Axel Pinz
Image Vis. Comput.1
2006 Multiregion Level Set Tracking with Transformation Invariant Shape Priors
Michael Fussenegger, Rachid Deriche, Axel Pinz
ACCV (1)1
2006 A Multiphase Level Set Based Segmentation Framework with Pose Invariant Shape Priors
Michael Fussenegger, Rachid Deriche, Axel Pinz
ACCV (2)1
2006 Generic Object Recognition with Boosting
abstract
This paper explores the power and the limitations of weakly supervised categorization. We present a complete framework that starts with the extraction of various local regions of either discontinuity or homogeneity. A variety of local descriptors can be applied to form a set of feature vectors for each local region. Boosting is used to learn a subset of such feature vectors (weak hypotheses) and to combine them into one final hypothesis for each visual category. This combination of individual extractors and descriptors leads to recognition rates that are superior to other approaches which use only one specific extractor/descriptor setting. To explore the limitation of our system, we had to set up new, highly complex image databases that show the objects of interest at varying scales and poses, in cluttered background, and under considerable occlusion. We obtain classification results up to 81 percent ROC-equal error rate on the most complex of our databases. Our approach outperforms all comparable solutions on common databases.
Andreas Opelt, Axel Pinz, Michael Fussenegger, Peter Auer
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2004 Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition
Andreas Opelt, Michael Fussenegger, Axel Pinz, Peter Auer
ECCV (2)2