Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mike D'Arcy

dblp:44/4867 · also Michel D'Arcy · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-2280-917XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.812024
ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews · ACL (1) 2024
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis
document representation
0.712023
SciRepEval: A Multi-Format Benchmark for Scientific Document Representations · EMNLP 2023
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.712023
SciRepEval: A Multi-Format Benchmark for Scientific Document Representations · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
scientific text
0.212024
ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

corpus construction · 1.5multi-task training · 0.7control codes · 0.7adapter · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews
abstract
Mike D’Arcy, Alexis Ross, Erin Bransom, Bailey Kuehl, Jonathan Bragg, Tom Hope, Doug Downey. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Mike D'Arcy, Alexis Ross, Erin Bransom, Bailey Kuehl, Jonathan Bragg, Tom Hope, Doug Downey
ACL (1)1
2024 Deriva-ML: A Continuous FAIRness Approach to Reproducible Machine Learning Models
abstract
Increasingly, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are used in eScience applications [9]. While these approaches have great potential, the literature has shown that ML-based approaches frequently suffer from results that are either incorrect or unreproducible due to mismanagement or misuse of data used for training and validating the models [12], [15]. Recognition of the necessity of high-quality data for correct ML results has led to data-centric ML approaches that shift the central focus from model development to creation of high-quality data sets to train and validate the models [14], [20]. However, there are limited tools and methods available for data-centric approaches to explore and evaluate ML solutions for eScience problems which often require collaborative multidisciplinary teams working with models and data that will rapidly evolve as an investigation unfolds [1]. In this paper, we show how data management tools based on the principle that all of the data for ML should be findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (i.e. FAIR [26]) can significantly improve the quality of data that is used for ML applications. When combined with best practices that apply these tools to the entire life cycle of an ML-based eScience investigation, we can significantly improve the ability of an eScience team to create correct and reproducible ML solutions. We propose an architecture and implementation of such tools and demonstrate through two use cases how they can be used to improve ML-based eScience investigations.
Carl Kesselman, Mike D'Arcy, Michael Pazzani, Benjamin Yizing Xu
e-Science3
2023 SciRepEval: A Multi-Format Benchmark for Scientific Document Representations
abstract
Learned representations of scientific documents can serve as valuable input features for downstream tasks without further fine-tuning.However, existing benchmarks for evaluating these representations fail to capture the diversity of relevant tasks.In response, we introduce SciRepEval, the first comprehensive benchmark for training and evaluating scientific document representations.It includes 24 challenging and realistic tasks, 8 of which are new, across four formats: classification, regression, ranking and search.We then use this benchmark to study and improve the generalization ability of scientific document representation models.We show how state-of-the-art models like SPECTER and SciNCL struggle to generalize across the task formats, and that simple multi-task training fails to improve them.However, a new approach that learns multiple embeddings per document, each tailored to a different format, can improve performance.We experiment with task-format-specific control codes and adapters and find they outperform the existing single-embedding state-of-the-art by over 2 points absolute.We release the resulting family of multi-format models, called SPECTER2, for the community to use and build on.
Amanpreet Singh, Mike D'Arcy, Arman Cohan, Doug Downey, Sergey Feldman
EMNLP2
2020 Towards Co-Evolution of Data-Centric Ecosystems
abstract
Database evolution is a notoriously difficult task, and it is exacerbated by the necessity to evolve database-dependent applications. As science becomes increasingly dependent on sophisticated data management, the need to evolve an array of database-driven systems will only intensify. In this paper, we present an architecture for data-centric ecosystems that allows the components to seamlessly co-evolve by centralizing the models and mappings at the data service and pushing model-adaptive interactions to the database clients. Boundary objects fill the gap where applications are unable to adapt and need a stable interface to interact with the components of the ecosystem. Finally, evolution of the ecosystem is enabled via integrated schema modification and model management operations. We present use cases from actual experiences that demonstrate the utility of our approach.
Robert Schuler, Karl Czajkowski, Mike D'Arcy, Hongsuda Tangmunarunkit, Carl Kesselman
SSDBM3
2019 DeepMoTIon: Learning to Navigate Like Humans
abstract
We present a novel human-aware navigation approach, where the robot learns to mimic humans to navigate safely in crowds. The presented model, referred to as Deep-MoTIon, is trained with pedestrian surveillance data to predict human velocity in the environment. The robot processes LiDAR scans via the trained network to navigate to the target location. We conduct extensive experiments to assess the components of our network and prove their necessity to imitate humans. Our experiments show that DeepMoTIion outperforms all the benchmarks in terms of human imitation, achieving a 24% reduction in time series-based path deviation over the next best approach. In addition, while many other approaches often failed to reach the target, our method reached the target in 100% of the test cases while complying with social norms and ensuring human safety.
Mahmoud Hamandi, Mike D'Arcy, Pooyan Fazli
RO-MAN2
2016 I'll take that to go: Big data bags and minimal identifiers for exchange of large, complex datasets
abstract
Big data workflows often require the assembly and exchange of complex, multi-element datasets. For example, in biomedical applications, the input to an analytic pipeline can be a dataset consisting thousands of images and genome sequences assembled from diverse repositories, requiring a description of the contents of the dataset in a concise and unambiguous form. Typical approaches to creating datasets for big data workflows assume that all data reside in a single location, requiring costly data marshaling and permitting errors of omission and commission because dataset members are not explicitly specified. We address these issues by proposing simple methods and tools for assembling, sharing, and analyzing large and complex datasets that scientists can easily integrate into their daily workflows. These tools combine a simple and robust method for describing data collections (BDBags), data descriptions (Research Objects), and simple persistent identifiers (Minids) to create a powerful ecosystem of tools and services for big data analysis and sharing. We present these tools and use biomedical case studies to illustrate their use for the rapid assembly, sharing, and analysis of large datasets.
Kyle Chard, Mike D'Arcy, Benjamin D. Heavner, Ian T. Foster, Carl Kesselman, Ravi K. Madduri, Alexis A. Rodriguez, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Carole A. Goble, Kristi Clark, Eric W. Deutsch, Ivo D. Dinov, Nathan D. Price 0001, Arthur W. Toga
IEEE BigData2
2015 A system to build distributed multivariate models and manage disparate data sharing policies: implementation in the scalable national network for effectiveness research
abstract
BACKGROUND: Centralized and federated models for sharing data in research networks currently exist. To build multivariate data analysis for centralized networks, transfer of patient-level data to a central computation resource is necessary. The authors implemented distributed multivariate models for federated networks in which patient-level data is kept at each site and data exchange policies are managed in a study-centric manner. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to implement infrastructure that supports the functionality of some existing research networks (e.g., cohort discovery, workflow management, and estimation of multivariate analytic models on centralized data) while adding additional important new features, such as algorithms for distributed iterative multivariate models, a graphical interface for multivariate model specification, synchronous and asynchronous response to network queries, investigator-initiated studies, and study-based control of staff, protocols, and data sharing policies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the requirements gathered from statisticians, administrators, and investigators from multiple institutions, the authors developed infrastructure and tools to support multisite comparative effectiveness studies using web services for multivariate statistical estimation in the SCANNER federated network. RESULTS: The authors implemented massively parallel (map-reduce) computation methods and a new policy management system to enable each study initiated by network participants to define the ways in which data may be processed, managed, queried, and shared. The authors illustrated the use of these systems among institutions with highly different policies and operating under different state laws. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Federated research networks need not limit distributed query functionality to count queries, cohort discovery, or independently estimated analytic models. Multivariate analyses can be efficiently and securely conducted without patient-level data transport, allowing institutions with strict local data storage requirements to participate in sophisticated analyses based on federated research networks.
Daniella Meeker, Xiaoqian Jiang, Michael E. Matheny, Claudiu Farcas, Mike D'Arcy, Laura Pearlman, Lavanya Nookala, Michele E. Day, Katherine K. Kim, Hyeon-Eui Kim, Aziz A. Boxwala, Robert El-Kareh, Grace Kuo, Frederic S. Resnic, Carl Kesselman, Lucila Ohno-Machado
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.5
2006 Monitoring the Earth System Grid with MDS4
abstract
In production Grids for scientific applications, service and resource failures must be detected and addressed quickly. In this paper, we describe the monitoring infrastructure used by the Earth System Grid (ESG) project, a scientific collaboration that supports global climate research. ESG uses the Globus Toolkit Monitoring and Discovery System (MDS4) to monitor its resources. We describe how the MDS4 Index Service collects information about ESG resources and how the MDS4 Trigger Service checks specified failure conditions and notifies system administrators when failures occur. We present monitoring statistics for May 2006 and describe our experiences using MDS4 to monitor ESG resources over the last two years.
Ann L. Chervenak, Jennifer M. Schopf, Laura Pearlman, Mei-Hui Su, Shishir Bharathi, Luca Cinquini, Mike D'Arcy, Neill Miller, David E. Bernholdt
e-Science7