Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mona Attariyan

dblp:44/6870 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 30%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Program analysis · 14% Empirical software engineering · 9%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network management and operations · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
adapter modules
0.412019
Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
parameter-efficient transfer learning
0.412019
Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning
0.412019
Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019
Distributed systems › anomaly detection
performance anomaly diagnosis
0.112012
X-ray: Automating Root-Cause Diagnosis of Performance Anomalies in Production Software · OSDI 2012
Distributed systems › root cause analysis
root cause localization
0.112012
X-ray: Automating Root-Cause Diagnosis of Performance Anomalies in Production Software · OSDI 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.112019
Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP · ICML 2019
Network management and operations › fault management
fault diagnosis
0.112008
Using Causality to Diagnose Configuration Bugs · USENIX ATC 2008
Software maintenance and evolution
software configuration management
0.112007
AutoBash: improving configuration management with operating system causality analysis · SOSP 2007
Program analysis › dynamic analysis
dynamic information-flow tracking
0.012010
Automating Configuration Troubleshooting with Dynamic Information Flow Analysis · OSDI 2010
Empirical software engineering
causal inference
0.012007
AutoBash: improving configuration management with operating system causality analysis · SOSP 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fine-tuning · 0.4adapter modules · 0.4dynamic information flow analysis · 0.1speculative execution · 0.1causal tracking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP
abstract
Fine-tuning large pretrained models is an effective transfer mechanism in NLP. However, in the presence of many downstream tasks, fine-tuning is parameter inefficient: an entire new model is required for every task. As an alternative, we propose transfer with adapter modules. Adapter modules yield a compact and extensible model; they add only a few trainable parameters per task, and new tasks can be added without revisiting previous ones. The parameters of the original network remain fixed, yielding a high degree of parameter sharing. To demonstrate adapter’s effectiveness, we transfer the recently proposed BERT Transformer model to $26$ diverse text classification tasks, including the GLUE benchmark. Adapters attain near state-of-the-art performance, whilst adding only a few parameters per task. On GLUE, we attain within $0.8%$ of the performance of full fine-tuning, adding only $3.6%$ parameters per task. By contrast, fine-tuning trains $100%$ of the parameters per task.
Neil Houlsby, Andrei Giurgiu, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Bruna Morrone, Quentin de Laroussilhe, Andrea Gesmundo, Mona Attariyan, Sylvain Gelly
ICML7
2012 X-ray: Automating Root-Cause Diagnosis of Performance Anomalies in Production Software
Mona Attariyan, Michael Chow, Jason Flinn
OSDI1
2010 Automating Configuration Troubleshooting with Dynamic Information Flow Analysis
Mona Attariyan, Jason Flinn
OSDI1
2008 Using Causality to Diagnose Configuration Bugs
Mona Attariyan, Jason Flinn
USENIX ATC1
2007 Low-cost protection for SER upsets and silicon defects
Mojtaba Mehrara, Mona Attariyan, Smitha Shyam, Kypros Constantinides, Valeria Bertacco, Todd M. Austin
DATE2
2007 AutoBash: improving configuration management with operating system causality analysis
abstract
AutoBash is a set of interactive tools that helps users and system administrators manage configurations. AutoBash leverages causal tracking support implemented within our modified Linux kernel to understand the inputs (causal dependencies) and outputs (causal effects) of configuration actions. It uses OS-level speculative execution to try possible actions, examine their effects, and roll them back when necessary. AutoBash automates many of the tedious parts of trying to fix a misconfiguration, including searching through possible solutions, testing whether a particular solution fixes a problem, and undoing changes to persistent and transient state when a solution fails. Our results show that AutoBash correctly identifies the solution to several CVS, gcc cross-compiler, and Apache configuration errors. We also show that causal analysis reduces AutoBash's search time by an average of 35% and solution verification time by an average of 70%.
Ya-Yunn Su, Mona Attariyan, Jason Flinn
SOSP2