Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julien Weissenberg

dblp:44/9941 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Segmentation and scene understanding · 87% 3D vision · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.212014
Learning Where to Classify in Multi-view Semantic Segmentation · ECCV (5) 2014
Geometric modeling and processing
procedural modeling
0.212013
Is There a Procedural Logic to Architecture? · CVPR 2013
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis
0.212013
Is There a Procedural Logic to Architecture? · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › scene parsing
facade parsing
0.112012
A Three-Layered Approach to Facade Parsing · ECCV (7) 2012
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
multi-view vision
0.112014
Learning Where to Classify in Multi-view Semantic Segmentation · ECCV (5) 2014
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding
0.012012
A Three-Layered Approach to Facade Parsing · ECCV (7) 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

classification location learning · 0.2grammatical inference · 0.2layered parsing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Dilemma First Search for effortless optimization of NP-hard problems
abstract
To tackle the exponentiality associated with NP-hard problems, two paradigms have been proposed. First, Branch & Bound, like Dynamic Programming, achieve efficient exact inference but requires extensive information and analysis about the problem at hand. Second, meta-heuristics are easier to implement but comparatively inefficient. As a result, a number of problems have been left unoptimized and plain greedy solutions are used. We introduce a theoretical framework and propose a powerful yet simple search method called Dilemma First Search (DFS). DFS exploits the decision heuristic needed for the greedy solution for further optimization. DFS is useful when it is hard to design efficient exact inference. We evaluate DFS on two problems: First, the Knapsack problem, for which efficient algorithms exist, serves as a toy example. Second, Decision Tree inference, where state-of-the-art algorithms rely on the greedy or randomness-based solutions. We further show that decision trees benefit from optimizations that are performed in a fraction of the iterations required by a random-based search.
Julien Weissenberg, Hayko Riemenschneider, Ralf Dragon, Luc Van Gool
ICPR1
2014 Learning Where to Classify in Multi-view Semantic Segmentation
Hayko Riemenschneider, András Bódis-Szomorú, Julien Weissenberg, Luc Van Gool
ECCV (5)3
2013 Is There a Procedural Logic to Architecture?
abstract
Urban models are key to navigation, architecture and entertainment. Apart from visualizing facades, a number of tedious tasks remain largely manual (e.g. compression, generating new facade designs and structurally comparing facades for classification, retrieval and clustering). We propose a novel procedural modelling method to automatically learn a grammar from a set of facades, generate new facade instances and compare facades. To deal with the difficulty of grammatical inference, we reformulate the problem. Instead of inferring a compromising, one-size-fits-all, single grammar for all tasks, we infer a model whose successive refinements are production rules tailored for each task. We demonstrate our automatic rule inference on datasets of two different architectural styles. Our method supercedes manual expert work and cuts the time required to build a procedural model of a facade from several days to a few milliseconds.
Julien Weissenberg, Hayko Riemenschneider, Mukta Prasad, Luc Van Gool
CVPR1
2012 A Three-Layered Approach to Facade Parsing
Andelo Martinovic, Markus Mathias, Julien Weissenberg, Luc Van Gool
ECCV (7)3