Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Gundert

dblp:441/9869 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.912025
Clustering via Hedonic Games: New Concepts and Algorithms · NeurIPS 2025
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection
0.912025
Clustering via Hedonic Games: New Concepts and Algorithms · NeurIPS 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › coalition formation
coalition formation game
0.912025
Clustering via Hedonic Games: New Concepts and Algorithms · NeurIPS 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › coalition formation
hedonic games
0.912025
Clustering via Hedonic Games: New Concepts and Algorithms · NeurIPS 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › coalition formation
stability in coalition formation
0.312025
Clustering via Hedonic Games: New Concepts and Algorithms · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Clustering via Hedonic Games: New Concepts and Algorithms
abstract
We study fundamental connections between coalition formation games and clustering, illustrating the cross-disciplinary relevance of these concepts. We focus on graphical hedonic games where agents' preferences are compactly represented by a friendship graph and an enemy graph. In the context of clustering, friendship relations naturally align with data point similarities, whereas enmity corresponds to dissimilarities. We consider two stability notions based on single-agent deviations: local popularity and local stability. Exploring these concepts from an algorithmic viewpoint, we design efficient mechanisms for finding locally stable or locally popular partitions. Besides gaining theoretical insight into the computational complexity of these problems, we perform simulations that demonstrate how our algorithms can be successfully applied in clustering and community detection. Our findings highlight the interplay between coalition formation games and data-driven clustering techniques, offering fresh perspectives and applications in both areas.
Gergely Csáji, Alexander Gundert, Jörg Rothe, Ildikó Schlotter
NeurIPS2