Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pieter Noordhuis
dblp:45/10283
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 77% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 23% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel Training · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 Applied Machine Learning at Facebook: A Datacenter Infrastructure Perspective · HPCA 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
data parallel training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel Training · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
gradient aggregation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel Training · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter infrastructure |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Applied Machine Learning at Facebook: A Datacenter Infrastructure Perspective · HPCA 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel Training · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Applied Machine Learning at Facebook: A Datacenter Infrastructure Perspective · HPCA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
GPU training · 0.7CPU inference · 0.7gradient bucketing · 0.4computation-communication overlap · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel TrainingabstractThis paper presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of the PyTorch distributed data parallel module. Py-Torch is a widely-adopted scientific computing package used in deep learning research and applications. Recent advances in deep learning argue for the value of large datasets and large models, which necessitates the ability to scale out model training to more computational resources. Data parallelism has emerged as a popular solution for distributed training thanks to its straightforward principle and broad applicability. In general, the technique of distributed data parallelism replicates the model on every computational resource to generate gradients independently and then communicates those gradients at each iteration to keep model replicas consistent. Despite the conceptual simplicity of the technique, the subtle dependencies between computation and communication make it non-trivial to optimize the distributed training efficiency. As of v1.5, PyTorch natively provides several techniques to accelerate distributed data parallel, including bucketing gradients, overlapping computation with communication, and skipping gradient synchronization. Evaluations show that, when configured appropriately, the PyTorch distributed data parallel module attains near-linear scalability using 256 GPUs. Yanli Zhao, Rohan Varma, Omkar Salpekar, Pieter Noordhuis, Teng Li 0009, Adam Paszke, Jeff Smith, Brian Vaughan, Pritam Damania, Soumith Chintala |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 5 |
| 2018 | Applied Machine Learning at Facebook: A Datacenter Infrastructure PerspectiveabstractMachine learning sits at the core of many essential products and services at Facebook. This paper describes the hardware and software infrastructure that supports machine learning at global scale. Facebook's machine learning workloads are extremely diverse: services require many different types of models in practice. This diversity has implications at all layers in the system stack. In addition, a sizable fraction of all data stored at Facebook flows through machine learning pipelines, presenting significant challenges in delivering data to high-performance distributed training flows. Computational requirements are also intense, leveraging both GPU and CPU platforms for training and abundant CPU capacity for real-time inference. Addressing these and other emerging challenges continues to require diverse efforts that span machine learning algorithms, software, and hardware design. Kim M. Hazelwood, Sarah Bird, David Brooks 0001, Soumith Chintala, Utku Diril, Dmytro Dzhulgakov, Mohamed Fawzy, Bill Jia, Yangqing Jia, Aditya Kalro, James Law, Jason Lu, Pieter Noordhuis, Mikhail Smelyanskiy, Liang Xiong, Xiaodong Wang 0020 |
HPCA | 14 |
| 2010 | Mining Twitter in the Cloud: A Case StudyabstractMining and analyzing data from social networks can be difficult because of the large amounts of data involved. Such activities are usually very expensive, as they require a lot of computational resources. With the recent success of cloud computing, data analysis is going to be more accessible due to easier access to less expensive computational resources. In this work we propose to use cloud computing services as a possible solution for analysis of large amounts of data. As a source for a large data set, we propose to use Twitter, yielding a graph with 50 million nodes and 1.8 billion edges. In this paper, we use computation of PageRank on Twitter's social graph to investigate whether or not cloud computing, and Amazon cloud services in particular, can make these tasks more feasible and, as a side effect, whether or not PageRank provides a good ranking of Twitter users. Pieter Noordhuis, Michiel Heijkoop, Alexander Lazovik |
IEEE CLOUD | 1 |