Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cynthia L. Smith

dblp:45/10368 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-3691-0324ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › text analysis
text classification
0.512021
Utilizing image and caption information for biomedical document classification · Bioinform. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

word embeddings · 0.5meta-classification · 0.5figure-word representation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Corrigendum to: Utilizing image and caption information for biomedical document classification
abstract
Bioinformatics (2021), Volume 37(Suppl1), i468–i476, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab331 The error is thus only in mis-typing the formulae themselves; not in the actual calculations of the precision and the recall used throughout the paper. As such, the other parts of the manuscript – specifically the experimental results reported, all stand as they appear in the original publication, and are not impacted by this correction.
Pengyuan Li 0001, Xiangying Jiang, Juan Trelles Trabucco, Daniela Raciti, Cynthia L. Smith, Martin Ringwald, G. Elisabeta Marai, Cecilia N. Arighi, Hagit Shatkay
Bioinform.6
2021 Utilizing image and caption information for biomedical document classification
abstract
MOTIVATION: Biomedical research findings are typically disseminated through publications. To simplify access to domain-specific knowledge while supporting the research community, several biomedical databases devote significant effort to manual curation of the literature-a labor intensive process. The first step toward biocuration requires identifying articles relevant to the specific area on which the database focuses. Thus, automatically identifying publications relevant to a specific topic within a large volume of publications is an important task toward expediting the biocuration process and, in turn, biomedical research. Current methods focus on textual contents, typically extracted from the title-and-abstract. Notably, images and captions are often used in publications to convey pivotal evidence about processes, experiments and results. RESULTS: We present a new document classification scheme, using both image and caption information, in addition to titles-and-abstracts. To use the image information, we introduce a new image representation, namely Figure-word, based on class labels of subfigures. We use word embeddings for representing captions and titles-and-abstracts. To utilize all three types of information, we introduce two information integration methods. The first combines Figure-words and textual features obtained from captions and titles-and-abstracts into a single larger vector for document representation; the second employs a meta-classification scheme. Our experiments and results demonstrate the usefulness of the newly proposed Figure-words for representing images. Moreover, the results showcase the value of Figure-words, captions and titles-and-abstracts in providing complementary information for document classification; these three sources of information when combined, lead to an overall improved classification performance. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and the list of PMIDs of the publications in our datasets are available upon request.
Pengyuan Li 0001, Xiangying Jiang, Juan Trelles Trabucco, Daniela Raciti, Cynthia L. Smith, Martin Ringwald, G. Elisabeta Marai, Cecilia N. Arighi, Hagit Shatkay
Bioinform.6
2011 Improving ontologies by automatic reasoning and evaluation of logical definitions
abstract
BACKGROUND: Ontologies are widely used to represent knowledge in biomedicine. Systematic approaches for detecting errors and disagreements are needed for large ontologies with hundreds or thousands of terms and semantic relationships. A recent approach of defining terms using logical definitions is now increasingly being adopted as a method for quality control as well as for facilitating interoperability and data integration. RESULTS: We show how automated reasoning over logical definitions of ontology terms can be used to improve ontology structure. We provide the Java software package GULO (Getting an Understanding of LOgical definitions), which allows fast and easy evaluation for any kind of logically decomposed ontology by generating a composite OWL ontology from appropriate subsets of the referenced ontologies and comparing the inferred relationships with the relationships asserted in the target ontology. As a case study we show how to use GULO to evaluate the logical definitions that have been developed for the Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (MPO). CONCLUSIONS: Logical definitions of terms from biomedical ontologies represent an important resource for error and disagreement detection. GULO gives ontology curators a fast and simple tool for validation of their work.
Sebastian Köhler 0001, Sebastian Bauer 0002, Chris Mungall, Gabriele Carletti, Cynthia L. Smith, Paul N. Schofield, Georgios V. Gkoutos, Peter N. Robinson
BMC Bioinform.5