Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel R. Fernandes
dblp:45/641
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › indexing › index compression
index pruning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Improving Web search efficiency via a locality based static pruning method · WWW 2005 |
Information retrieval › indexing › index compression › index pruning
static index pruning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Improving Web search efficiency via a locality based static pruning method · WWW 2005 |
Information retrieval › indexing › index compression
inverted index compression |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Improving Web search efficiency via a locality based static pruning method · WWW 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lossless compression · 0.1locality-based pruning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Improving Web search efficiency via a locality based static pruning methodabstractThe unarguably fast, and continuous, growth of the volume of indexed (and indexable) documents on the Web poses a great challenge for search engines. This is true regarding not only search effectiveness but also time and space efficiency. In this paper we present an index pruning technique targeted for search engines that addresses the latter issue without disconsidering the former. To this effect, we adopt a new pruning strategy capable of greatly reducing the size of search engine indices. Experiments using a real search engine show that our technique can reduce the indices' storage costs by up to 60% over traditional lossless compression methods, while keeping the loss in retrieval precision to a minimum. When compared to the indices size with no compression at all, the compression rate is higher than 88%, i.e., less than one eighth of the original size. More importantly, our results indicate that, due to the reduction in storage overhead, query processing time can be reduced to nearly 65% of the original time, with no loss in average precision. The new method yields significative improvements when compared against the best known static pruning method for search engine indices. In addition, since our technique is orthogonal to the underlying search algorithms, it can be adopted by virtually any search engine. Edleno Silva de Moura, Célia Francisca dos Santos, Daniel R. Fernandes, Altigran S. da Silva, Pável Calado, Mario A. Nascimento |
WWW | 3 |