Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel R. Fernandes

dblp:45/641 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › indexing › index compression
index pruning
0.112005
Improving Web search efficiency via a locality based static pruning method · WWW 2005
Information retrieval › indexing › index compression › index pruning
static index pruning
0.112005
Improving Web search efficiency via a locality based static pruning method · WWW 2005
Information retrieval › indexing › index compression
inverted index compression
0.012005
Improving Web search efficiency via a locality based static pruning method · WWW 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lossless compression · 0.1locality-based pruning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Improving Web search efficiency via a locality based static pruning method
abstract
The unarguably fast, and continuous, growth of the volume of indexed (and indexable) documents on the Web poses a great challenge for search engines. This is true regarding not only search effectiveness but also time and space efficiency. In this paper we present an index pruning technique targeted for search engines that addresses the latter issue without disconsidering the former. To this effect, we adopt a new pruning strategy capable of greatly reducing the size of search engine indices. Experiments using a real search engine show that our technique can reduce the indices' storage costs by up to 60% over traditional lossless compression methods, while keeping the loss in retrieval precision to a minimum. When compared to the indices size with no compression at all, the compression rate is higher than 88%, i.e., less than one eighth of the original size. More importantly, our results indicate that, due to the reduction in storage overhead, query processing time can be reduced to nearly 65% of the original time, with no loss in average precision. The new method yields significative improvements when compared against the best known static pruning method for search engine indices. In addition, since our technique is orthogonal to the underlying search algorithms, it can be adopted by virtually any search engine.
Edleno Silva de Moura, Célia Francisca dos Santos, Daniel R. Fernandes, Altigran S. da Silva, Pável Calado, Mario A. Nascimento
WWW3