Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keith McGreggor

dblp:45/9797 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 67% Vision and language · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 5%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
analogical reasoning
0.422014
Fractals and Ravens · Artif. Intell. 2014
Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices Tests · AAAI 2014
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
0.322014
Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices Tests · AAAI 2014
Two Visual Strategies for Solving the Raven's Progressive Matrices Intelligence Test · AAAI 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › analogical reasoning
visual analogy
0.212014
Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices Tests · AAAI 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › abstract reasoning › abstract visual reasoning
raven's progressive matrices
0.222014
Two Visual Strategies for Solving the Raven's Progressive Matrices Intelligence Test · AAAI 2011
Fractals and Ravens · Artif. Intell. 2014
Computational geometry › geometric transformation
affine transformation
0.112011
Two Visual Strategies for Solving the Raven's Progressive Matrices Intelligence Test · AAAI 2011
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation
0.112014
Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices Tests · AAAI 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fractal method · 0.2affine method · 0.2visual representation · 0.2resolution adjustment · 0.2confidence calculation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Entrepreneurship: A New Frontier in a Computational Science of Creativity
Ashok K. Goel 0001, Mukundan Kuthalam, Sung Hong, Keith McGreggor
ICCC4
2016 Bistable Perception and Fractal Reasoning
Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001
Diagrams1
2015 Visual Case Retrieval for Interpreting Skill Demonstrations
Tesca Fitzgerald, Keith McGreggor, Baris Akgün, Andrea Thomaz, Ashok K. Goel 0001
ICCBR2
2014 Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices Tests
abstract
We report a novel approach to addressing the Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM) tests, one based upon purely visual representations. Our technique introduces the calculation of confidence in an answer and the automatic adjustment of level of resolution if that confidence is insufficient. We first describe the nature of the visual analogies found on the RPM. We then exhibit our algorithm and work through a detailed example. Finally, we present the performance of our algorithm on the four major variants of the RPM tests, illustrating the impact of confidence. This is the first such account of any computational model against the entirety of the Raven’s.
Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001
AAAI1
2014 Fractals and Ravens
Keith McGreggor, Maithilee Kunda, Ashok K. Goel 0001
Artif. Intell.1
2012 Reasoning on the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices Test with Iconic Visual Representations
Maithilee Kunda, Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001
CogSci2
2011 Two Visual Strategies for Solving the Raven's Progressive Matrices Intelligence Test
abstract
We present two visual algorithms, called the affine and fractal methods, which each solve a considerable portion of the Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM) test. The RPM is considered to be one of the premier psychometric measures of general intelligence. Current computational accounts of the RPM assume that visual test inputs are translated into propositional representations before further reasoning takes place. We propose that visual strategies can also solve RPM problems, in line with behavioral evidence showing that humans do use visual strategies to some extent on the RPM. Our two visual methods currently solve RPM problems at the level of typical 9- to 10-year-olds.
Maithilee Kunda, Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001
AAAI2
2011 Finding the odd one out: a fractal analogical approach
abstract
The Odd One Out test of intelligence consists of 3x3 matrix reasoning problems organized in 20 levels of difficulty. Addressing problems on this test appears to require integration of multiple cognitive abilities usually associated with creativity, including visual encoding, similarity assessment, pattern detection, and analogical transfer. We describe a novel fractal technique for addressing visual analogy problems on the Odd One Out test. In our technique, the relationship between images is encoded fractally, capturing inherent self-similarity. The technique starts at a high level of resolution, but, if that is not sufficient to resolve ambiguity, it automatically adjusts itself to the right level of resolution for addressing a given problem. Similarly, the technique automatically starts with searching for similarity between simpler relationships, but, if that is not sufficient to resolve ambiguity, it automatically searches for similarity between higher-order relationships. We present preliminary results from applying the fractal technique on a representative subset of the problems from the Odd One Out test.
Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001
Creativity & Cognition1
2011 Fractal Analogies: Preliminary Results from the Raven's Test of Intelligence
Keith McGreggor, Maithilee Kunda, Ashok K. Goel 0001
ICCC1
2010 A Fractal Approach Towards Visual Analogy
Keith McGreggor, Maithilee Kunda, Ashok K. Goel 0001
ICCC1
2010 The interplay of context and emotion for non-anthropomorphic robots
abstract
Household robots are becoming commonplace. The application of social cues, such as emotion, has the potential to make such robots easier to use and understand. However, it remains unclear how household robots can or should display emotion, and what considerations should be given to emotive behavior regarding the expected set of contexts in which the robot will operate. In this paper, we report the results of our systematic evaluation of context and emotion recognition of a non-anthropomorphic robot, the iRobot Roomba. Considerations, implications, and future work are discussed.
Bryan Wiltgen, Jenay M. Beer, Keith McGreggor, Karl Jiang, Andrea Thomaz
RO-MAN3