Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Keith McGreggor
dblp:45/9797
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 67% Vision and language · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 5% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational geometry · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
analogical reasoning |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | Fractals and Ravens · Artif. Intell. 2014 Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices Tests · AAAI 2014 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning |
0.3 | 2 | 2014 | Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices Tests · AAAI 2014 Two Visual Strategies for Solving the Raven's Progressive Matrices Intelligence Test · AAAI 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › analogical reasoning
visual analogy |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices Tests · AAAI 2014 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › abstract reasoning › abstract visual reasoning
raven's progressive matrices |
0.2 | 2 | 2014 | Two Visual Strategies for Solving the Raven's Progressive Matrices Intelligence Test · AAAI 2011 Fractals and Ravens · Artif. Intell. 2014 |
Computational geometry › geometric transformation
affine transformation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Two Visual Strategies for Solving the Raven's Progressive Matrices Intelligence Test · AAAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices Tests · AAAI 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fractal method · 0.2affine method · 0.2visual representation · 0.2resolution adjustment · 0.2confidence calculation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Entrepreneurship: A New Frontier in a Computational Science of Creativity
Ashok K. Goel 0001, Mukundan Kuthalam, Sung Hong, Keith McGreggor |
ICCC | 4 |
| 2016 | Bistable Perception and Fractal Reasoning
Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001 |
Diagrams | 1 |
| 2015 | Visual Case Retrieval for Interpreting Skill Demonstrations
Tesca Fitzgerald, Keith McGreggor, Baris Akgün, Andrea Thomaz, Ashok K. Goel 0001 |
ICCBR | 2 |
| 2014 | Confident Reasoning on Raven's Progressive Matrices TestsabstractWe report a novel approach to addressing the Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM) tests, one based upon purely visual representations. Our technique introduces the calculation of confidence in an answer and the automatic adjustment of level of resolution if that confidence is insufficient. We first describe the nature of the visual analogies found on the RPM. We then exhibit our algorithm and work through a detailed example. Finally, we present the performance of our algorithm on the four major variants of the RPM tests, illustrating the impact of confidence. This is the first such account of any computational model against the entirety of the Raven’s. Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2014 | Fractals and Ravens
Keith McGreggor, Maithilee Kunda, Ashok K. Goel 0001 |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2012 | Reasoning on the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices Test with Iconic Visual Representations
Maithilee Kunda, Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001 |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2011 | Two Visual Strategies for Solving the Raven's Progressive Matrices Intelligence TestabstractWe present two visual algorithms, called the affine and fractal methods, which each solve a considerable portion of the Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM) test. The RPM is considered to be one of the premier psychometric measures of general intelligence. Current computational accounts of the RPM assume that visual test inputs are translated into propositional representations before further reasoning takes place. We propose that visual strategies can also solve RPM problems, in line with behavioral evidence showing that humans do use visual strategies to some extent on the RPM. Our two visual methods currently solve RPM problems at the level of typical 9- to 10-year-olds. Maithilee Kunda, Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2011 | Finding the odd one out: a fractal analogical approachabstractThe Odd One Out test of intelligence consists of 3x3 matrix reasoning problems organized in 20 levels of difficulty. Addressing problems on this test appears to require integration of multiple cognitive abilities usually associated with creativity, including visual encoding, similarity assessment, pattern detection, and analogical transfer. We describe a novel fractal technique for addressing visual analogy problems on the Odd One Out test. In our technique, the relationship between images is encoded fractally, capturing inherent self-similarity. The technique starts at a high level of resolution, but, if that is not sufficient to resolve ambiguity, it automatically adjusts itself to the right level of resolution for addressing a given problem. Similarly, the technique automatically starts with searching for similarity between simpler relationships, but, if that is not sufficient to resolve ambiguity, it automatically searches for similarity between higher-order relationships. We present preliminary results from applying the fractal technique on a representative subset of the problems from the Odd One Out test. Keith McGreggor, Ashok K. Goel 0001 |
Creativity & Cognition | 1 |
| 2011 | Fractal Analogies: Preliminary Results from the Raven's Test of Intelligence
Keith McGreggor, Maithilee Kunda, Ashok K. Goel 0001 |
ICCC | 1 |
| 2010 | A Fractal Approach Towards Visual Analogy
Keith McGreggor, Maithilee Kunda, Ashok K. Goel 0001 |
ICCC | 1 |
| 2010 | The interplay of context and emotion for non-anthropomorphic robotsabstractHousehold robots are becoming commonplace. The application of social cues, such as emotion, has the potential to make such robots easier to use and understand. However, it remains unclear how household robots can or should display emotion, and what considerations should be given to emotive behavior regarding the expected set of contexts in which the robot will operate. In this paper, we report the results of our systematic evaluation of context and emotion recognition of a non-anthropomorphic robot, the iRobot Roomba. Considerations, implications, and future work are discussed. Bryan Wiltgen, Jenay M. Beer, Keith McGreggor, Karl Jiang, Andrea Thomaz |
RO-MAN | 3 |