Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ashwini Shukla

dblp:46/10625 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 54% Autonomous driving · 26% Generative modeling · 20%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › nonprehensile manipulation
in-flight object catching
0.212014
Catching Objects in Flight · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction
0.212014
Catching Objects in Flight · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.112012
Augmented-SVM: Automatic space partitioning for combining multiple non-linear dynamics · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Generative modeling
motion generation
0.112012
Augmented-SVM: Automatic space partitioning for combining multiple non-linear dynamics · NIPS 2012
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.112014
Catching Objects in Flight · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014
Mathematical optimization
support vector machine
0.012012
Augmented-SVM: Automatic space partitioning for combining multiple non-linear dynamics · NIPS 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.3dynamical systems · 0.3probabilistic configuration search · 0.2dynamical systems approach · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Cognitive mechanism in synchronized motion: An internal predictive model for manual tracking control (special session)
abstract
Many daily tasks involve spatio-temporal coordination between two agents. Study of such coordinated actions in human-human and human-robot interaction has received increased attention of late. In this work, we use the mirror paradigm to study coupling of hand motion in a leader-follower game. The main aim of this study is to model the motion of the follower, given a particular motion of the leader. We propose a mathematical model consistent with the internal model hypothesis and the delays in the sensorimotor system. A qualitative comparison of data collected in four human dyads shows that it is possible to successfully model the motion of the follower.
Mahdi Khoramshahi, Ashwini Shukla, Aude Billard
SMC2
2014 Catching Objects in Flight
abstract
We address the difficult problem of catching in-flight objects with uneven shapes. This requires the solution of three complex problems: accurate prediction of the trajectory of fastmoving objects, predicting the feasible catching configuration, and planning the arm motion, and all within milliseconds. We follow a programming-by-demonstration approach in order to learn, from throwing examples, models of the object dynamics and arm movement. We propose a new methodology to find a feasible catching configuration in a probabilistic manner. We use the dynamical systems approach to encode motion from several demonstrations. This enables a rapid and reactive adaptation of the arm motion in the presence of sensor uncertainty. We validate the approach in simulation with the iCub humanoid robot and in real-world experiments with the KUKA LWR 4+ (7-degree-of-freedom arm robot) to catch a hammer, a tennis racket, an empty bottle, a partially filled bottle, and a cardboard box.
Seungsu Kim, Ashwini Shukla, Aude Billard
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2012 Augmented-SVM: Automatic space partitioning for combining multiple non-linear dynamics
abstract
Non-linear dynamical systems (DS) have been used extensively for building generative models of human behavior. Its applications range from modeling brain dynamics to encoding motor commands. Many schemes have been proposed for encoding robot motions using dynamical systems with a single attractor placed at a predefined target in state space. Although these enable the robots to react against sudden perturbations without any re-planning, the motions are always directed towards a single target. In this work, we focus on combining several such DS with distinct attractors, resulting in a multi-stable DS. We show its applicability in reach-to-grasp tasks where the attractors represent several grasping points on the target object. While exploiting multiple attractors provides more flexibility in recovering from unseen perturbations, it also increases the complexity of the underlying learning problem. Here we present the Augmented-SVM (A-SVM) model which inherits region partitioning ability of the well known SVM classifier and is augmented with novel constraints derived from the individual DS. The new constraints modify the original SVM dual whose optimal solution then results in a new class of support vectors (SV). These new SV ensure that the resulting multi-stable DS incurs minimum deviation from the original dynamics and is stable at each of the attractors within a finite region of attraction. We show, via implementations on a simulated 10 degrees of freedom mobile robotic platform, that the model is capable of real-time motion generation and is able to adapt on-the-fly to perturbations.
Ashwini Shukla, Aude Billard
NIPS1