Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre Kleberger

dblp:46/11146 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-6427-4620ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 62% Embedded and real-time systems · 38%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault injection
1.012026
On the Reduction of Error Space for Model-Implemented Fault- and Attack Injection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Embedded and real-time systems
model-based design
0.312026
On the Reduction of Error Space for Model-Implemented Fault- and Attack Injection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Embedded and real-time systems › model-based design
simulink models
0.312026
On the Reduction of Error Space for Model-Implemented Fault- and Attack Injection · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inject-on-write · 2.0inject-on-read · 2.0error space pruning · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 On the Reduction of Error Space for Model-Implemented Fault- and Attack Injection
abstract
Fault- and attack injection are techniques used to measure dependability attributes of computer systems. An important property of such techniques is their efficiency in exploring the target system's fault- or attack space. As this space is generally very large, pre-injection analysis techniques may be used to effectively explore the space. In this paper, we study two such techniques proposed in the past, namelyinject-on-readandinject-on-write. Furthermore, we propose two new techniques callederror space pruning of signalsanderror space pruning of signals and portsand evaluate their efficiency in reducing the space needed to be explored by injection experiments. These techniques were integrated into MODIFI, a fault- and attack injector targeting Simulink models. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to evaluate these pre-injection techniques for this kind of injector. The results of our evaluation of 11 Simulink models from the automotive domain and one from the avionics domain, show that the new proposed techniques reduce the fault- and attack space needed to be explored by about 27–49%. Using MODIFI, we then performed injection experiments on two automotive models, as well as an aero engine control model, while elaborating on the results obtained.
Peter Folkesson, Behrooz Sangchoolie, Pierre Kleberger, Nasser Nowdehi, Georgios Giantamidis, Vassilios A. Tsachouridis, Stylianos Basagiannis
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.3
2022 On the Evaluation of Three Pre-Injection Analysis Techniques for Model-Implemented Fault- and Attack Injection
abstract
Fault- and attack injection are techniques used to measure dependability attributes of computer systems. An important property of such injectors is their efficiency that deals with the time and effort needed to explore the target system's fault- or attack space. As this space is generally very large, techniques such as pre-injection analyses are used to effectively explore the space. In this paper, we study two such techniques that have been proposed in the past, namely inject-on-read and inject-on-write. Moreover, we propose a new technique called error space pruning of signals and evaluate its efficiency in reducing the space needed to be explored by fault and attack injection experiments. We implemented and integrated these techniques into MODIFI, a model-implemented fault and attack injector, which has been effectively used in the past to evaluate Simulink models in the presence of faults and attacks. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to integrate these pre-injection analysis techniques into an injector that injects faults and attacks into Simulink models. The results of our evaluation on 11 vehicular Simulink models show that the error space pruning of signals reduce the attack space by about 30–43%, hence allowing the attack space to be exploited by fewer number of attack injection experiments. Using MODIFI, we then performed attack injection experiments on two of these vehicular Simulink models, a comfort control model and a brake-by-wire model, while elaborating on the results obtained.
Peter Folkesson, Behrooz Sangchoolie, Pierre Kleberger, Nasser Nowdehi
PRDC3
2014 Securing Vehicle Diagnostics in Repair Shops
Pierre Kleberger, Tomas Olovsson
SAFECOMP1
2013 Protecting Vehicles Against Unauthorised Diagnostics Sessions Using Trusted Third Parties
Pierre Kleberger, Tomas Olovsson
SAFECOMP1
2011 Security aspects of the in-vehicle network in the connected car
abstract
In this paper, we briefly survey the research with respect to the security of the connected car, and in particular its in-vehicle network. The aim is to highlight the current state of the research; which are the problems found, and what solutions have been suggested. We have structured our investigation by categorizing the research into the following five categories: problems in the in-vehicle network, architectural security features, intrusion detection systems, honeypots, and threats and attacks. We conclude that even though quite some effort has already been expended in the area, most of it has been directed towards problem definition and not so much towards security solutions. We also highlight a few areas that we believe are of immediate concern.
Pierre Kleberger, Tomas Olovsson, Erland Jonsson
Intelligent Vehicles Symposium1