Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kimmo Palin
dblp:46/1920
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-4621-6128ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence motif analysis
position weight matrix matching |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Fast motif matching revisited: high-order PWMs, SNPs and indels · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence motif analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Fast motif matching revisited: high-order PWMs, SNPs and indels · Bioinform. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sliding window algorithm · 0.3high-order position weight matrix · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Fast motif matching revisited: high-order PWMs, SNPs and indelsabstractMotivation: While the position weight matrix (PWM) is the most popular model for sequence motifs, there is growing evidence of the usefulness of more advanced models such as first-order Markov representations, and such models are also becoming available in well-known motif databases. There has been lots of research of how to learn these models from training data but the problem of predicting putative sites of the learned motifs by matching the model against new sequences has been given less attention. Moreover, motif site analysis is often concerned about how different variants in the sequence affect the sites. So far, though, the corresponding efficient software tools for motif matching have been lacking. Results: We develop fast motif matching algorithms for the aforementioned tasks. First, we formalize a framework based on high-order position weight matrices for generic representation of motif models with dinucleotide or general q -mer dependencies, and adapt fast PWM matching algorithms to the high-order PWM framework. Second, we show how to incorporate different types of sequence variants , such as SNPs and indels, and their combined effects into efficient PWM matching workflows. Benchmark results show that our algorithms perform well in practice on genome-sized sequence sets and are for multiple motif search much faster than the basic sliding window algorithm. Availability and Implementation: Implementations are available as a part of the MOODS software package under the GNU General Public License v3.0 and the Biopython license ( http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/group/pssmfind ). Contact: [email protected]. Janne H. Korhonen, Kimmo Palin, Jussi Taipale, Esko Ukkonen |
Bioinform. | 2 |