Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abraham Mukosi Mukwevho
dblp:46/5631
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-6317-601XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 56% Distributed systems · 44% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
proactive fault tolerance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Toward a Smart Cloud: A Review of Fault-Tolerance Methods in Cloud Systems · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2021 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud service management |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Toward a Smart Cloud: A Review of Fault-Tolerance Methods in Cloud Systems · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.5artificial intelligence · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Toward a Smart Cloud: A Review of Fault-Tolerance Methods in Cloud SystemsabstractThis paper presents a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art work on fault tolerance methods proposed for cloud computing. The survey classifies fault-tolerance methods into three categories: 1) ReActive Methods (RAMs); 2) PRoactive Methods (PRMs); and 3) ReSilient Methods (RSMs). RAMs allow the system to enter into a fault status and then try to recover the system. PRMs tend to prevent the system from entering a fault status by implementing mechanisms that enable them to avoid errors before they affect the system. On the other hand, recently emerging RSMs aim to minimize the amount of time it takes for a system to recover from a fault. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence have played an active role in RSM domain in such a way that the recovery time is mapped to a function to be optimized (i.e., by converging the recovery time to a fraction of milliseconds). As the system learns to deal with new faults, the recovery time will become shorter. In addition, current issues and challenges in cloud fault tolerance are also discussed to identify promising areas for future research. Abraham Mukosi Mukwevho, Turgay Çelik 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 1 |