Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chew Hung Lee

dblp:47/2241 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 50% Program verification · 50%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 77% Logic in computer science · 23%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.012004
A combined approach to checking web ontologies · WWW 2004
Requirements engineering and software design
formal specification
0.012004
Verifying DAML+OIL and Beyond in Z/EVES · ICSE 2004
Program verification
theorem proving
0.012004
Verifying DAML+OIL and Beyond in Z/EVES · ICSE 2004
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated reasoning
ontology reasoning
0.012004
A combined approach to checking web ontologies · WWW 2004
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology language
0.012004
Verifying DAML+OIL and Beyond in Z/EVES · ICSE 2004
Logic in computer science
formal specification
0.012004
A combined approach to checking web ontologies · WWW 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

alloy analyzer · 0.1Z/EVES · 0.1RACER · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Verifying DAML+OIL and Beyond in Z/EVES
abstract
Semantic Web, the next generation of Web, gives data well-defined and machine-understandable meaning so that they can be processed by remote intelligent agents cooperatively. Ontology languages are the building blocks of Semantic Web as they prescribe how data are defined and related. The existing reasoning and verification tools for Semantic Web are improving however still elementary. We believe that Semantic Web can be a novel application domain for software modeling languages and tools. Z is a formal modeling language for specifying software systems and Z/EVES is a proof tool for Z. In this paper, we firstly present Z semantics for ontology language DAML+OIL. This semantic model is embedded as a Z section daml2zin Z/EVES, which serves as an environment for checking and verifying Web ontologies. Then we present a tool for automatically transforming ontology documents into the specialized Z codes understood by Z/EVES. Finally, we use a recent real application, the military plan ontologies, to demonstrate the different reasoning tasks that Z/EVES can perform. Furthermore, undiscovered errors in the original ontologies were found by Z/EVES and some of these errors are even beyond Semantic Web modeling and reasoning capabilities.
Jin Song Dong 0001, Chew Hung Lee, Yuan-Fang Li, Hai H. Wang
ICSE2
2004 A combined approach to checking web ontologies
abstract
The understanding of Semantic Web documents is built upon ontologies that define concepts and relationships of data. Hence, the correctness of ontologies is vital. Ontology reasoners such as RACER and FaCT have been developed to reason ontologies with a high degree of automation. However, complex ontology-related properties may not be expressible within the current web ontology languages, consequently they may not be checkable by RACER and FaCT. We propose to use the software engineering techniques and tools, i.e., Z/EVES and Alloy Analyzer, to complement the ontology tools for checking Semantic Web documents.In this approach, Z/EVES is first applied to remove trivial syntax and type errors of the ontologies. Next, RACER is used to identify any ontological inconsistencies, whose origins can be traced by Alloy Analyzer. Finally Z/EVES is used again to express complex ontology-related properties and reveal errors beyond the modeling capabilities of the current web ontology languages. We have successfully applied this approach to checking a set of military plan ontologies.
Jin Song Dong 0001, Chew Hung Lee, Hian Beng Lee, Yuan-Fang Li, Hai H. Wang
WWW2
2003 Analysing Web Ontology in Alloy: A Military Case Study
Jin Song Dong 0001, Jun Sun 0001, Hai H. Wang, Chew Hung Lee, Hian Beng Lee
SEKE4