Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roshan Raj
dblp:47/3306
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-5573-8063ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 7 · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
5 papers |
Computational complexity · 41% Algorithms and data structures · 27% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 18% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures
learning algorithms |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Read-Once Determinants and the Principal Minor Assignment Problem · STOC 2026 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › matroid theory
matroid partitioning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Matroids are Equitable · SODA 2026 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
matroid theory |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Matroids are Equitable · SODA 2026 |
Computational complexity › algebraic complexity
polynomial identity testing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Read-Once Determinants and the Principal Minor Assignment Problem · STOC 2026 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
proper learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Read-Once Determinants and the Principal Minor Assignment Problem · STOC 2026 |
Computational complexity
algebraic complexity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Border Complexity of Symbolic Determinant Under Rank One Restriction · CCC 2023 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
arithmetic circuit lower bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Border Complexity of Symbolic Determinant Under Rank One Restriction · CCC 2023 |
Computational complexity
circuit complexity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Border Complexity of Symbolic Determinant Under Rank One Restriction · CCC 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › matroid constraint › matroid optimization
matroid intersection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Deterministic Parallel Reduction from Weighted Matroid Intersection Search to Decision · SODA 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures › parallel algorithms
NC algorithms |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Deterministic Parallel Reduction from Weighted Matroid Intersection Search to Decision · SODA 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures
parallel algorithms |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Deterministic Parallel Reduction from Weighted Matroid Intersection Search to Decision · SODA 2022 |
Computational complexity
parallel complexity |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Deterministic Parallel Reduction from Weighted Matroid Intersection Search to Decision · SODA 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › matroid constraint › matroid optimization › matroid intersection
weighted matroid intersection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Deterministic Parallel Reduction from Weighted Matroid Intersection Search to Decision · SODA 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
randomized algorithm · 1.0derandomization · 1.0combinatorial proof · 1.0combinatorial testing · 0.9border complexity · 0.7rank oracle · 0.6deterministic parallel reduction · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Matroids are EquitableabstractWe show that if the ground set of a matroid can be partitioned into \(k \ge 2\) bases, then for any given subset \(S\) of the ground set, there is a partition into k bases such that the sizes of the intersections of the bases with \(S\) may differ by at most one. This settles the matroid equitability conjecture by Fekete and Szabo (Electron. J. Comb. 2011) in the affirmative. We also investigate equitable splittings of two disjoint sets \(S_1\) and \(S_2\), and show that there is a partition into \(k\) bases such that the sizes of the intersections with \(S_1\) may differ by at most one and the sizes of the intersections with \(S_2\) may differ by at most two; this is the best one can hope for arbitrary matroids. Hannaneh Akrami, Roshan Raj, László A. Végh |
SODA | 2 |
| 2026 | Learning Read-Once Determinants and the Principal Minor Assignment ProblemabstractA symbolic determinant under rank-one restriction computes a polynomial of the form det(A0 + A1y1 + … + Anyn), where A0, A1, …, An are square matrices over a field F and rank(Ai) = 1 for each i ∈ [n]. This class of polynomials has been studied extensively, since the work of Edmonds (1967), in the context of linear matroids, matching, matrix completion and polynomial identity testing. We study the following learning problem for this class: Given black-box access to an n-variate polynomial f = det(A0 + A1y1 + … + Anyn), where A0, A1, …, An are unknown square matrices over F and rank(Ai) = 1 for each i ∈ [n], find a square matrix B0 and rank-one square matrices B1, …, Bn over F such that f = det(B0 + B1y1 + … + Bnyn). In this work, we give a randomized poly(n) time algorithm to solve this problem; the algorithm can be derandomized in quasi-polynomial time. To our knowledge, this is the first efficient learning algorithm for this class. As the above-mentioned class is known to be equivalent to the class of read-once determinants (RODs), we will refer to the problem as learning RODs. An ROD computes the determinant of a matrix whose entries are field constants or variables and every variable appears at most once in the matrix. Thus, the class of RODs is a rare example of a well-studied class of polynomials that admits efficient proper learning. Abhiram Aravind, Abhranil Chatterjee 0001, Sumanta Ghosh, Rohit Gurjar, Roshan Raj, Chandan Saha 0001 |
STOC | 5 |
| 2025 | Characterizing and Testing Principal Minor Equivalence of Matrices
Abhranil Chatterjee 0001, Sumanta Ghosh, Rohit Gurjar, Roshan Raj |
STOC | 4 |
| 2024 | Fractional Linear Matroid Matching Is in Quasi-NCabstractThe matching and linear matroid intersection problems are solvable in quasi-NC, meaning that there exist deterministic algorithms that run in polylogarithmic time and use quasi-polynomially many parallel processors. However, such a parallel algorithm is unknown for linear matroid matching, which generalizes both of these problems. In this work, we propose a quasi-NC algorithm for fractional linear matroid matching, which is a relaxation of linear matroid matching and commonly generalizes fractional matching and linear matroid intersection. Our algorithm builds upon the connection of fractional matroid matching to non-commutative Edmonds' problem recently revealed by Oki and Soma~(2023). As a corollary, we also solve black-box non-commutative Edmonds' problem with rank-two skew-symmetric coefficients. Rohit Gurjar, Taihei Oki, Roshan Raj |
ESA | 3 |
| 2024 | A Deterministic Parallel Reduction from Weighted Matroid Intersection Search to Decision
Sumanta Ghosh, Rohit Gurjar, Roshan Raj |
Algorithmica | 3 |
| 2023 | Border Complexity of Symbolic Determinant Under Rank One Restriction
Abhranil Chatterjee 0001, Sumanta Ghosh, Rohit Gurjar, Roshan Raj |
CCC | 4 |
| 2022 | A Deterministic Parallel Reduction from Weighted Matroid Intersection Search to DecisionabstractGiven two matroids on the same ground set, the matroid intersection problem asks for a common base, i.e., a subset of the ground set that is a base in both the matroids. The weighted version of the problem asks for a common base with maximum weight. In the general case, when the two matroids are given via rank oracles, the question of its parallel complexity is completely open. In the case of linearly representable matroids, the problem is known to have randomized parallel (RNC) algorithms, when the given weights are polynomially bounded. Finding a deterministic parallel (NC) algorithm in this case, even for the decision question, has been a long standing open question. We make some progress towards understanding the parallel complexity of matroid intersection by showing that the weighted matroid intersection (WMI) search problem is equivalent to its decision version, in a parallel model of computation. More precisely, we give an NC algorithm for WMI-search using an oracle access to WMI-decision. This resolves an open question posed by Anari and Vazirani (ITCS 2020). Sumanta Ghosh, Rohit Gurjar, Roshan Raj |
SODA | 3 |