Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Floraine Grabler
dblp:47/5043
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Visualization and visual analytics · 76% Visual content generation and editing · 13% Image and video processing · 11% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Learning and educational technologies · 50% Interaction techniques and input · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Learning and educational technologies › educational content generation
tutorial generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Generating photo manipulation tutorials by demonstration · ACM Trans. Graph. 2009 |
Visualization and visual analytics › geospatial visualization
cartographic visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automatic generation of tourist maps · ACM Trans. Graph. 2008 |
Visualization and visual analytics › geospatial visualization
map generalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automatic generation of tourist maps · ACM Trans. Graph. 2008 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Parsing Images of Architectural Scenes · ICCV 2007 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Parsing Images of Architectural Scenes · ICCV 2007 |
Visual content generation and editing
image editing |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Generating photo manipulation tutorials by demonstration · ACM Trans. Graph. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
screen recording · 0.2automated image labeling · 0.2web-based information extraction · 0.1multiperspective rendering · 0.1matting · 0.1image-specific model bootstrapping · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Generating photo manipulation tutorials by demonstrationabstractWe present a demonstration-based system for automatically generating succinct step-by-step visual tutorials of photo manipulations. An author first demonstrates the manipulation using an instrumented version of GIMP that records all changes in interface and application state. From the example recording, our system automatically generates tutorials that illustrate the manipulation using images, text, and annotations. It leverages automated image labeling (recognition of facial features and outdoor scene structures in our implementation) to generate more precise text descriptions of many of the steps in the tutorials. A user study comparing our automatically generated tutorials to hand-designed tutorials and screen-capture video recordings finds that users are 20--44% faster and make 60--95% fewer errors using our tutorials. While our system focuses on tutorial generation, we also present some initial work on generating content-dependent macros that use image recognition to automatically transfer selection operations from the example image used in the demonstration to new target images. While our macros are limited to transferring selection operations we demonstrate automatic transfer of several common retouching techniques including eye recoloring, whitening teeth and sunset enhancement. Floraine Grabler, Maneesh Agrawala, Wilmot Li, Mira Dontcheva, Takeo Igarashi |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 1 |
| 2008 | Automatic generation of tourist mapsabstractTourist maps are essential resources for visitors to an unfamiliar city because they visually highlight landmarks and other points of interest. Yet, hand-designed maps are static representations that cannot adapt to the needs and tastes of the individual tourist. In this paper we present an automated system for designing tourist maps that selects and highlights the information that is most important to tourists. Our system determines the salience of map elements using bottom-up vision-based image analysis and top-down web-based information extraction techniques. It then generates a map that emphasizes the most important elements, using a combination of multiperspective rendering to increase visibility of streets and landmarks, and cartographic generalization techniques such as simplification, deformation, and displacement to emphasize landmarks and de-emphasize less important buildings. We show a number of automatically generated tourist maps of San Francisco and compare them to existing automated and manual approaches. Floraine Grabler, Maneesh Agrawala, Robert W. Sumner, Mark Pauly |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 1 |
| 2007 | Parsing Images of Architectural ScenesabstractWe address image parsing in the setting of architectural scenes. Our goal is to parse an image into regions of various types such as sky, foliage, buildings, and street. Furthermore we parse the building regions at a finer level of detail, identifying the positions of windows, doors, and rooflines, the colors of walls, and the spatial extent of particular buildings. Recognizing these individual elements is often impossible without the context provided by the initial parsing of the image, for instance a roofline is only defined in relation to the building below and the sky above. Our approach is driven by recognition of generic classes of visual appearance, e.g. for foliage. The generic recognition results boot-strap an image specific model that provides refined estimates to use for matting, segmentation, and more detailed parsing. Alexander C. Berg, Floraine Grabler, Jitendra Malik |
ICCV | 2 |