Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

E. M. Wilcox

dblp:48/2223 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools › visual programming
direct manipulation programming
0.011997
Does Continuous Visual Feedback Aid Debugging in Direct-Manipulation Programming Systems? · CHI 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled experiment · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Does Continuous Visual Feedback Aid Debugging in Direct-Manipulation Programming Systems?
abstract
Continuous visual feedback is becoming a common feature in direct-manipulation programming systems of all klndsfrom demonstrational macro builders to spreadsheet packages to visual programming languages featuring direct manipulation.But does continuous visual feedback actually help in the domain of programming?There has been little investigation of this question, and what evidence there is from related domains points in conflicting directions.To advance what is known about this issue, we conducted an empirical study to determine whether the inclusion of continuous visual feedback into a direct-manipulation programming system helps with one particular task: debugging.Our results were that although continuous visual feedback did not significantly help with debugging in general, it did significantly help with debugging in some circumstances.Our results also indicate three factors that may help determine those circumstances.
E. M. Wilcox, John Atwood, Margaret M. Burnett, Jonathan J. Cadiz, Curtis R. Cook
CHI1