Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

David C. Kao

dblp:48/4718 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › test adequacy › coverage criteria › structural coverage criteria
state coverage		 0.112007
State coverage: a structural test adequacy criterion for behavior checking · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007
Software testing › test adequacy › coverage criteria
structural coverage criteria		 0.112007
State coverage: a structural test adequacy criterion for behavior checking · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007
Software testing
test adequacy		 0.112007
State coverage: a structural test adequacy criterion for behavior checking · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 State coverage: a structural test adequacy criterion for behavior checking
abstract
We propose a new language-independent, structural test adequacy criterion called state coverage. State coverage measures whether unit-level tests check the outputs and sideeffects of a program.
Kenneth Koster, David C. Kao
 ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE2