Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Gosset

dblp:48/7411 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3975-2253ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 10 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
9 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 86% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 11% Computational complexity · 2%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory
1.442024
Classical Simulation of Peaked Shallow Quantum Circuits · STOC 2024
Quantum 3-SAT Is QMA1-Complete · SIAM J. Comput. 2016
The Bose-Hubbard Model is QMA-complete · ICALP (1) 2014
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum circuit complexity
shallow quantum circuits
1.122024
Classical Simulation of Peaked Shallow Quantum Circuits · STOC 2024
Quantum Advantage with Noisy Shallow Circuits in 3D · FOCS 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum entanglement
area law
1.022022
An area law for 2d frustration-free spin systems · STOC 2022
Entanglement subvolume law for 2d frustration-free spin systems · STOC 2020
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum entanglement
entanglement entropy
1.022022
An area law for 2d frustration-free spin systems · STOC 2022
Entanglement subvolume law for 2d frustration-free spin systems · STOC 2020
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit synthesis
1.012026
Quantum State Preparation with Optimal T-Count · SODA 2026
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum state preparation
1.012026
Quantum State Preparation with Optimal T-Count · SODA 2026
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph coloring
chi-boundedness
0.912025
Triply efficient shadow tomography · SODA 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph coloring
0.912025
Triply efficient shadow tomography · SODA 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum measurement
0.912025
Triply efficient shadow tomography · SODA 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum state tomography
0.912025
Triply efficient shadow tomography · SODA 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum state tomography
shadow tomography
0.912025
Triply efficient shadow tomography · SODA 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit simulation
0.812024
Classical Simulation of Peaked Shallow Quantum Circuits · STOC 2024
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
quantum satisfiability
0.422016
Quantum 3-SAT Is QMA1-Complete · SIAM J. Comput. 2016
Quantum 3-SAT Is QMA1-Complete · FOCS 2013
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit complexity
0.412019
Quantum Advantage with Noisy Shallow Circuits in 3D · FOCS 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum error correction
0.412019
Quantum Advantage with Noisy Shallow Circuits in 3D · FOCS 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum error correction
surface codes
0.412019
Quantum Advantage with Noisy Shallow Circuits in 3D · FOCS 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum gates
quantum gate synthesis
0.312026
Quantum State Preparation with Optimal T-Count · SODA 2026
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum circuit synthesis
unitary synthesis
0.312026
Quantum State Preparation with Optimal T-Count · SODA 2026
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum complexity classes
0.212016
Quantum 3-SAT Is QMA1-Complete · SIAM J. Comput. 2016
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.222016
Quantum 3-SAT Is QMA1-Complete · FOCS 2013
Quantum 3-SAT Is QMA1-Complete · SIAM J. Comput. 2016
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
hamiltonian complexity
0.212014
The Bose-Hubbard Model is QMA-complete · ICALP (1) 2014
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
QMA-completeness
0.212014
The Bose-Hubbard Model is QMA-complete · ICALP (1) 2014
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.212013
Quantum 3-SAT Is QMA1-Complete · FOCS 2013
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum advantage
0.112019
Quantum Advantage with Noisy Shallow Circuits in 3D · FOCS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polynomial approximation · 1.0approximate ground state projector · 1.0asymptotic analysis · 1.0ancilla-assisted synthesis · 1.0fractional coloring · 0.9bell measurement · 0.9sampling · 0.8quasi-polynomial time algorithm · 0.8reduction · 0.4constant-depth circuit · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Quantum State Preparation with Optimal T-Count
abstract
How many \(T\) gates are needed to approximate an arbitrary \(n\)-qubit quantum state to within error \(\varepsilon\)? Improving prior work of Low, Kliuchnikov, and Schaeffer, we show that the optimal asymptotic scaling is \(\Theta\left(\sqrt{2^n \log(1/\varepsilon)} + \log(1/\varepsilon)\right)\) if we allow ancilla qubits. We also show that this is the optimal \(T\)-count for implementing an arbitrary diagonal \(n\)-qubit unitary to within error \(\varepsilon\). We describe applications in which a tensor product of many single-qubit unitaries can be synthesized in parallel for the price of one.
David Gosset, Robin Kothari, Kewen Wu 0005
SODA1
2025 Triply efficient shadow tomography
abstract
Given copies of a quantum state ρ, a shadow tomography protocol aims to learn all expectation values from a fixed set of observables, to within a given precision ε. We say that a shadow tomography protocol is triply efficient if it is sample- and time-efficient, and only employs measurements that entangle a constant number of copies of ρ at a time. The classical shadows protocol based on random single-copy measurements is triply efficient for the set of local Pauli observables. This and other protocols based on random singlecopy Clifford measurements can be understood as arising from fractional colorings of a graph G that encodes the commutation structure of the set of observables. Here we describe a framework for two-copy shadow tomography that uses an initial round of Bell measurements to reduce to a fractional coloring problem in an induced subgraph of G with bounded clique number. This coloring problem can be addressed using techniques from graph theory known as chi-boundedness. Using this framework we give the first triply efficient shadow tomography scheme for the set of local fermionic observables, which arise in a broad class of interacting fermionic systems in physics and chemistry. We also give a triply efficient scheme for the set of all n-qubit Pauli observables. Our protocols for these tasks use two-copy measurements, which is necessary: sample- efficient schemes are provably impossible using only single-copy measurements. Finally, we give a shadow tomography protocol that compresses an n-qubit quantum state into a poly(n )-sized classical representation, from which one can extract the expected value of any of the 4n Pauli observables in poly(n ) time, up to a small constant error.
Robbie King, David Gosset, Robin Kothari, Ryan Babbush
SODA2
2024 Classical Simulation of Peaked Shallow Quantum Circuits
abstract
An n-qubit quantum circuit is said to be peaked if it has an output probability that is at least inverse-polynomially large as a function of n. We describe a classical algorithm with quasipolynomial runtime nO(logn) that approximately samples from the output distribution of a peaked constant-depth circuit. We give even faster algorithms for circuits composed of nearest-neighbor gates on a D-dimensional grid of qubits, with polynomial runtime nO(1) if D=2 and almost-polynomial runtime nO(loglogn) for D>2. Our sampling algorithms can be used to estimate output probabilities of shallow circuits to within a given inverse-polynomial additive error, improving previously known methods. As a simple application, we obtain a quasipolynomial algorithm to estimate the magnitude of the expected value of any Pauli observable in the output state of a shallow circuit (which may or may not be peaked). This is a dramatic improvement over the prior state-of-the-art algorithm which had an exponential scaling in √n.
Sergey Bravyi 0001, David Gosset
STOC2
2022 An area law for 2d frustration-free spin systems
abstract
We prove that the entanglement entropy of the ground state of a locally gapped frustration-free 2D lattice spin system satisfies an area law with respect to a vertical bipartition of the lattice into left and right regions. We first establish that the ground state projector of any locally gapped frustration-free 1D spin system can be approximated to within error є by a degree O(√nlog(є−1)) multivariate polynomial in the interaction terms of the Hamiltonian. This generalizes the optimal bound on the approximate degree of the boolean AND function, which corresponds to the special case of commuting Hamiltonian terms. For 2D spin systems we then construct an approximate ground state projector (AGSP) that employs the optimal 1D approximation in the vicinity of the boundary of the bipartition of interest. This AGSP has sufficiently low entanglement and error to establish the area law using a known technique.
Anurag Anshu, Itai Arad, David Gosset
STOC3
2020 Entanglement subvolume law for 2d frustration-free spin systems
abstract
Let H be a frustration-free Hamiltonian describing a 2D grid of qudits with local interactions, a unique ground state, and local spectral gap lower bounded by a positive constant. For any bipartition defined by a vertical cut of length L running from top to bottom of the grid, we prove that the corresponding entanglement entropy of the ground state of H is upper bounded by Õ(L 5/3). For the special case of a 1D chain, our result provides a new area law which improves upon prior work, in terms of the scaling with qudit dimension and spectral gap. In addition, for any bipartition of the grid into a rectangular region A and its complement, we show that the entanglement entropy is upper bounded as Õ(|∂ A|5/3) where ∂ A is the boundary of A. This represents a subvolume bound on entanglement in frustration-free 2D systems. In contrast with previous work, our bounds depend on the local (rather than global) spectral gap of the Hamiltonian. We prove our results using a known method which bounds the entanglement entropy of the ground state in terms of certain properties of an approximate ground state projector (AGSP). To this end, we construct a new AGSP which is based on a robust polynomial approximation of the AND function and we show that it achieves an improved trade-off between approximation error and entanglement.
Anurag Anshu, Itai Arad, David Gosset
STOC3
2019 Quantum Advantage with Noisy Shallow Circuits in 3D
abstract
Prior work has shown that there exists a relation problem which can be solved with certainty by a constant-depth quantum circuit composed of geometrically local gates in two dimensions, but cannot be solved with high probability by any classical constant depth circuit composed of bounded fan-in gates. Here we provide two extensions of this result. Firstly, we show that a separation in computational power persists even when the constant-depth quantum circuit is restricted to geometrically local gates in one dimension. The corresponding quantum algorithm is the simplest we know of which achieves a quantum advantage of this type. Our second, main result, is that a separation persists even if the shallow quantum circuit is corrupted by noise. We construct a relation problem which can be solved with near certainty using a noisy constant-depth quantum circuit composed of geometrically local gates in three dimensions, provided the noise rate is below a certain constant threshold value. On the other hand, the problem cannot be solved with high probability by a noise-free classical circuit of constant depth. A key component of the proof is a quantum error-correcting code which admits constant-depth logical Clifford gates and single-shot logical state preparation. We show that the surface code meets these criteria.
Sergey Bravyi 0001, David Gosset, Robert König, Marco Tomamichel
FOCS2
2016 Quantum 3-SAT Is QMA1-Complete
abstract
Quantum satisfiability is a constraint satisfaction problem that generalizes classical boolean satisfiability. In the quantum $k$-SAT problem, each constraint is specified by a $k$-local projector and is satisfied by any state in its nullspace. Bravyi showed that quantum 2-SAT can be solved efficiently on a classical computer and that quantum $k$-SAT with $k\geq 4$ is QMA$_1$-complete [S. Bravyi, Efficient Algorithm for a Quantum Analogue of 2-SAT, eprint arXiv:quant-ph/0602108, 2006]. Quantum 3-SAT was known to be contained in QMA$_1$ [Bravyi, 2006], but its computational hardness was unknown until now. We prove that quantum 3-SAT is QMA$_1$-hard, and therefore complete for this complexity class.
David Gosset, Daniel Nagaj
SIAM J. Comput.1
2014 The Bose-Hubbard Model is QMA-complete
Andrew M. Childs, David Gosset, Zak Webb
ICALP (1)2
2013 Quantum 3-SAT Is QMA1-Complete
abstract
Quantum satisfiability is a constraint satisfaction problem that generalizes classical boolean satisfiability. In the quantum k-SAT problem, each constraint is specified by a k-local projector and is satisfied by any state in its nullspace. Bravyi showed that quantum 2-SAT can be solved efficiently on a classical computer and that quantum k-SAT with k ≥ 4 is QMA1-complete [4]. Quantum 3-SAT was known to be contained in QMA1[4], but its computational hardness was unknown until now. We prove that quantum 3-SAT is QMA1-hard, and therefore complete for this complexity class.
David Gosset, Daniel Nagaj
FOCS1
2012 Quantum money from knots
abstract
Quantum money is a cryptographic protocol in which a mint can produce a quantum state, no one else can copy the state, and anyone (with a quantum computer) can verify that the state came from the mint. We present a concrete quantum money scheme based on superpositions of diagrams that encode oriented links with the same Alexander polynomial. We expect our scheme to be secure against computationally bounded adversaries.
Edward Farhi, David Gosset, Avinatan Hassidim, Andrew Lutomirski, Peter W. Shor
ITCS2