Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicole C. Hauser
dblp:49/3951
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 3 | 2005 | Microarray data warehouse allowing for inclusion of experiment annotations in statistical analysis · Bioinform. 2002 Processing and quality control of DNA array hybridization data · Bioinform. 2000 Integration of GO annotations in Correspondence Analysis: facilitating the interpretation of microarray data · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
microarray data management |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Microarray data warehouse allowing for inclusion of experiment annotations in statistical analysis · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Processing and quality control of DNA array hybridization data · Bioinform. 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
microarray quality control |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Processing and quality control of DNA array hybridization data · Bioinform. 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
correspondence analysis · 0.1statistical analysis · 0.0data warehousing · 0.0quality control · 0.0intensity normalization · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Integration of GO annotations in Correspondence Analysis: facilitating the interpretation of microarray dataabstractMOTIVATION: The functional interpretation of microarray datasets still represents a time-consuming and challenging task. Up to now functional categories that are relevant for one or more experimental context(s) have been commonly extracted from a set of regulated genes and presented in long lists. RESULTS: To facilitate interpretation, we integrated Gene Ontology (GO) annotations into Correspondence Analysis to display genes, experimental conditions and gene-annotations in a single plot. The position of the annotations in these plots can be directly used for the functional interpretation of clusters of genes or experimental conditions without the need for comparing long lists of annotations. Correspondence Analysis is not limited in the number of experimental conditions that can be compared simultaneously, allowing an easy identification of characterizing annotations even in complex experimental settings. Due to the rapidly increasing amount of annotation data available, we apply an annotation filter. Hereby the number of displayed annotations can be significantly reduced to a set of descriptive ones, further enhancing the interpretability of the plot. We validated the method on transcription data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human pancreatic adenocarcinomas. AVAILABILITY: The M-CHiPS software is accessible for collaborators at http://www.mchips.org Christian H. Busold, Stefan Winter 0004, Nicole C. Hauser, Andrea Bauer, Jürgen Dippon, Jörg D. Hoheisel, Kurt Fellenberg |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2002 | Microarray data warehouse allowing for inclusion of experiment annotations in statistical analysisabstractMOTIVATION: Microarray technology provides access to expression levels of thousands of genes at once, producing large amounts of data. These datasets are valuable only if they are annotated by sufficiently detailed experiment descriptions. However, in many databases a substantial number of these annotations is in free-text format and not readily accessible to computer-aided analysis. RESULTS: The Multi-Conditional Hybridization Intensity Processing System (M-CHIPS), a data warehousing concept, focuses on providing both structure and algorithms suitable for statistical analysis of a microarray database's entire contents including the experiment annotations. It addresses the rapid growth of the amount of hybridization data, more detailed experimental descriptions, and new kinds of experiments in the future. We have developed a storage concept, a particular instance of which is an organism-specific database. Although these databases may contain different ontologies of experiment annotations, they share the same structure and therefore can be accessed by the very same statistical algorithms. Experiment ontologies have not yet reached their final shape, and standards are reduced to minimal conventions that do not yet warrant extensive description. An ontology-independent structure enables updates of annotation hierarchies during normal database operation without altering the structure. AVAILABILITY AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://www.dkfz.de/tbi/services/mchips Kurt Fellenberg, Nicole C. Hauser, Benedikt Brors, Jörg D. Hoheisel, Martin Vingron |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2000 | Processing and quality control of DNA array hybridization dataabstractMOTIVATION: The technology of hybridization to DNA arrays is used to obtain the expression levels of many different genes simultaneously. It enables searching for genes that are expressed specifically under certain conditions. However, the technology produces large amounts of data demanding computational methods for their analysis. It is necessary to find ways to compare data from different experiments and to consider the quality and reproducibility of the data. RESULTS: Data analyzed in this paper have been generated by hybridization of radioactively labeled targets to DNA arrays spotted on nylon membranes. We introduce methods to compare the intensity values of several hybridization experiments. This is essential to find differentially expressed genes or to do pattern analysis. We also discuss possibilities for quality control of the acquired data. AVAILABILITY: http://www.dkfz.de/tbi CONTACT: [email protected] Tim Beißbarth, Kurt Fellenberg, Benedikt Brors, Rosa Arribas-Prat, Judith M. Boer, Nicole C. Hauser, Marcel Scheideler, Jörg D. Hoheisel, Günther Schütz, Annemarie Poustka, Martin Vingron |
Bioinform. | 6 |