Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alison M. Goate

dblp:49/4331 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-0576-2472ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.112008
Systematic biological prioritization after a genome-wide association study: an application to nicotine dependence · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › variant effect prediction
SNP prioritization
0.112008
Systematic biological prioritization after a genome-wide association study: an application to nicotine dependence · Bioinform. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pathway analysis · 0.1linkage disequilibrium · 0.1comparative genomics · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 A globally diverse reference alignment and panel for imputation of mitochondrial DNA variants
abstract
BACKGROUND: Variation in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) identified by genotyping microarrays or by sequencing only the hypervariable regions of the genome may be insufficient to reliably assign mitochondrial genomes to phylogenetic lineages or haplogroups. This lack of resolution can limit functional and clinical interpretation of a substantial body of existing mtDNA data. To address this limitation, we developed and evaluated a large, curated reference alignment of complete mtDNA sequences as part of a pipeline for imputing missing mtDNA single nucleotide variants (mtSNVs). We call our reference alignment and pipeline MitoImpute. RESULTS: We aligned the sequences of 36,960 complete human mitochondrial genomes downloaded from GenBank, filtered and controlled for quality. These sequences were reformatted for use in imputation software, IMPUTE2. We assessed the imputation accuracy of MitoImpute by measuring haplogroup and genotype concordance in data from the 1000 Genomes Project and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). The mean improvement of haplogroup assignment in the 1000 Genomes samples was 42.7% (Matthew's correlation coefficient = 0.64). In the ADNI cohort, we imputed missing single nucleotide variants. CONCLUSION: These results show that our reference alignment and panel can be used to impute missing mtSNVs in existing data obtained from using microarrays, thereby broadening the scope of functional and clinical investigation of mtDNA. This improvement may be particularly useful in studies where participants have been recruited over time and mtDNA data obtained using different methods, enabling better integration of early data collected using less accurate methods with more recent sequence data.
Tim W. McInerney, Brian Fulton-Howard, Christopher Patterson, Devashi Paliwal, Lars S. Jermiin, Hardip R. Patel, Judy Pa, Russell H. Swerdlow, Alison M. Goate, Simon Easteal, Shea J. Andrews
BMC Bioinform.9
2008 Systematic biological prioritization after a genome-wide association study: an application to nicotine dependence
abstract
MOTIVATION: A challenging problem after a genome-wide association study (GWAS) is to balance the statistical evidence of genotype-phenotype correlation with a priori evidence of biological relevance. RESULTS: We introduce a method for systematically prioritizing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for further study after a GWAS. The method combines evidence across multiple domains including statistical evidence of genotype-phenotype correlation, known pathways in the pathologic development of disease, SNP/gene functional properties, comparative genomics, prior evidence of genetic linkage, and linkage disequilibrium. We apply this method to a GWAS of nicotine dependence, and use simulated data to test it on several commercial SNP microarrays. AVAILABILITY: A comprehensive database of biological prioritization scores for all known SNPs is available at http://zork.wustl.edu/gin. This can be used to prioritize nicotine dependence association studies through a straightforward mathematical formula-no special software is necessary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Scott F. Saccone, Nancy L. Saccone, Gary E. Swan, Pamela A. F. Madden, Alison M. Goate, John P. Rice, Laura J. Bierut
Bioinform.5