Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timothée Cour
dblp:49/467
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 7 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 5 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Learning paradigms · 26% Image recognition and object detection · 17% Face, body and person analysis · 15% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 89% Indexing and storage engines · 11% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% Mathematical optimization · 27% Coding theory · 23% |
Topics — the 27 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
image retrieval |
0.5 | 3 | 2015 | Query Specific Rank Fusion for Image Retrieval · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 Query Specific Fusion for Image Retrieval · ECCV (2) 2012 Contextual weighting for vocabulary tree based image retrieval · ICCV 2011 |
Information retrieval › ranking
rank aggregation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Query Specific Rank Fusion for Image Retrieval · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning |
0.1 | 2 | 2010 | Learning from ambiguously labeled images · CVPR 2009 Talking pictures: Temporal grouping and dialog-supervised person recognition · CVPR 2010 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Large-scale image classification: Fast feature extraction and SVM training · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
large-scale image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Large-scale image classification: Fast feature extraction and SVM training · CVPR 2011 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › distributed optimization
parallel stochastic gradient descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Large-scale image classification: Fast feature extraction and SVM training · CVPR 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
partial label learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Learning from Partial Labels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Learning from Partial Labels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Information retrieval › image retrieval
large-scale image retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Contextual weighting for vocabulary tree based image retrieval · ICCV 2011 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Contextual weighting for vocabulary tree based image retrieval · ICCV 2011 |
Indexing and storage engines › vector index
vocabulary tree |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Contextual weighting for vocabulary tree based image retrieval · ICCV 2011 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Learning from ambiguously labeled images · CVPR 2009 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › cross-modal alignment
video-text alignment |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Movie/Script: Alignment and Parsing of Video and Text Transcription · ECCV (4) 2008 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Spectral Segmentation with Multiscale Graph Decomposition · CVPR (2) 2005 Recognizing objects by piecing together the Segmentation Puzzle · CVPR 2007 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Recognizing objects by piecing together the Segmentation Puzzle · CVPR 2007 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
part-based recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Recognizing objects by piecing together the Segmentation Puzzle · CVPR 2007 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Query Specific Rank Fusion for Image Retrieval · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Balanced Graph Matching · NIPS 2006 |
Mathematical optimization
spectral relaxation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Balanced Graph Matching · NIPS 2006 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › graph-based segmentation
spectral segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Spectral Segmentation with Multiscale Graph Decomposition · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph partitioning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Spectral Segmentation with Multiscale Graph Decomposition · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Coding theory
network coding |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Spectral Segmentation with Multiscale Graph Decomposition · CVPR (2) 2005 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
feature extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Large-scale image classification: Fast feature extraction and SVM training · CVPR 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multiple instance learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Talking pictures: Temporal grouping and dialog-supervised person recognition · CVPR 2010 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › person identification
character identification in video |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Learning from ambiguously labeled images · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › region-based segmentation
superpixel segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Recognizing objects by piecing together the Segmentation Puzzle · CVPR 2007 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › correspondence estimation
image correspondence |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Balanced Graph Matching · NIPS 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
query-specific fusion · 0.4graph-based link analysis · 0.2late fusion · 0.1spatial verification · 0.1one-against-all SVM · 0.1hadoop · 0.1contextual weighting · 0.1averaging stochastic gradient descent · 0.1spectral matching · 0.1semidefinite programming · 0.1dynamic programming inference · 0.1discriminative learning · 0.1convex surrogate loss minimization · 0.1shape similarity · 0.1affine transformation fitting · 0.1spectral graph partitioning · 0.1multiscale graph decomposition · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Query Specific Rank Fusion for Image RetrievalabstractRecently two lines of image retrieval algorithms demonstrate excellent scalability: 1) local features indexed by a vocabulary tree, and 2) holistic features indexed by compact hashing codes. Although both of them are able to search visually similar images effectively, their retrieval precision may vary dramatically among queries. Therefore, combining these two types of methods is expected to further enhance the retrieval precision. However, the feature characteristics and the algorithmic procedures of these methods are dramatically different, which is very challenging for the feature-level fusion. This motivates us to investigate how to fuse the ordered retrieval sets, i.e., the ranks of images, given by multiple retrieval methods, to boost the retrieval precision without sacrificing their scalability. In this paper, we model retrieval ranks as graphs of candidate images and propose a graph-based query specific fusion approach, where multiple graphs are merged and reranked by conducting a link analysis on a fused graph. The retrieval quality of an individual method is measured on-the-fly by assessing the consistency of the top candidates' nearest neighborhoods. Hence, it is capable of adaptively integrating the strengths of the retrieval methods using local or holistic features for different query images. This proposed method does not need any supervision, has few parameters, and is easy to implement. Extensive and thorough experiments have been conducted on four public datasets, i.e., the UKbench, Corel-5K, Holidays and the large-scale San Francisco Landmarks datasets. Our proposed method has achieved very competitive performance, including state-of-the-art results on several data sets, e.g., the N-S score 3.83 for UKbench. Shaoting Zhang 0001, Ming Yang 0007, Timothée Cour, Kai Yu 0001, Dimitris N. Metaxas |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 2012 | Query Specific Fusion for Image Retrieval
Shaoting Zhang 0001, Ming Yang 0007, Timothée Cour, Kai Yu 0001, Dimitris N. Metaxas |
ECCV (2) | 3 |
| 2011 | Large-scale image classification: Fast feature extraction and SVM trainingabstractMost research efforts on image classification so far have been focused on medium-scale datasets, which are often defined as datasets that can fit into the memory of a desktop (typically 4G~48G). There are two main reasons for the limited effort on large-scale image classification. First, until the emergence of ImageNet dataset, there was almost no publicly available large-scale benchmark data for image classification. This is mostly because class labels are expensive to obtain. Second, large-scale classification is hard because it poses more challenges than its medium-scale counterparts. A key challenge is how to achieve efficiency in both feature extraction and classifier training without compromising performance. This paper is to show how we address this challenge using ImageNet dataset as an example. For feature extraction, we develop a Hadoop scheme that performs feature extraction in parallel using hundreds of mappers. This allows us to extract fairly sophisticated features (with dimensions being hundreds of thousands) on 1.2 million images within one day. For SVM training, we develop a parallel averaging stochastic gradient descent (ASGD) algorithm for training one-against-all 1000-class SVM classifiers. The ASGD algorithm is capable of dealing with terabytes of training data and converges very fast-typically 5 epochs are sufficient. As a result, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on the ImageNet 1000-class classification, i.e., 52.9% in classification accuracy and 71.8% in top 5 hit rate. Yuanqing Lin, Fengjun Lv, Shenghuo Zhu, Ming Yang 0007, Timothée Cour, Kai Yu 0001, Liangliang Cao, Thomas S. Huang |
CVPR | 5 |
| 2011 | Contextual weighting for vocabulary tree based image retrievalabstractIn this paper we address the problem of image retrieval from millions of database images. We improve the vocabulary tree based approach by introducing contextual weighting of local features in both descriptor and spatial domains. Specifically, we propose to incorporate efficient statistics of neighbor descriptors both on the vocabulary tree and in the image spatial domain into the retrieval. These contextual cues substantially enhance the discriminative power of individual local features with very small computational overhead. We have conducted extensive experiments on benchmark datasets, i.e., the UKbench, Holidays, and our new Mobile dataset, which show that our method reaches state-of-the-art performance with much less computation. Furthermore, the proposed method demonstrates excellent scalability in terms of both retrieval accuracy and efficiency on large-scale experiments using 1.26 million images from the ImageNet database as distractors. Xiaoyu Wang 0002, Ming Yang 0007, Timothée Cour, Shenghuo Zhu, Kai Yu 0001, Tony X. Han |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2011 | Learning from Partial Labels
Timothée Cour, Benjamin Sapp, Ben Taskar |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2010 | Talking pictures: Temporal grouping and dialog-supervised person recognitionabstractWe address the character identification problem in movies and television videos: assigning names to faces on the screen. Most prior work on person recognition in video assumes some supervised data such as screenplay or handlabeled faces. In this paper, our only source of `supervision' are the dialog cues: first, second and third person references (such as “I'm Jack”, “Hey, Jack!” and “Jack left”). While this kind of supervision is sparse and indirect, we exploit multiple modalities and their interactions (appearance, dialog, mouth movement, synchrony, continuity-editing cues) to effectively resolve identities through local temporal grouping followed by global weakly supervised recognition. We propose a novel temporal grouping model that partitions face tracks across multiple shots while respecting appearance, geometric and film-editing cues and constraints. In this model, states represent partitions of the k most recent face tracks, and transitions represent compatibility of consecutive partitions. We present dynamic programming inference and discriminative learning for the model. The individual face tracks are subsequently assigned a name by learning a classifier from partial label constraints. The weakly supervised classifier incorporates multiple-instance constraints from dialog cues as well as soft grouping constraints from our temporal grouping. We evaluate both the temporal grouping and final character naming on several hours of TV and movies. Timothée Cour, Benjamin Sapp, Akash Nagle, Ben Taskar |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2009 | Learning from ambiguously labeled imagesabstractIn many image and video collections, we have access only to partially labeled data. For example, personal photo collections often contain several faces per image and a caption that only specifies who is in the picture, but not which name matches which face. Similarly, movie screenplays can tell us who is in the scene, but not when and where they are on the screen. We formulate the learning problem in this setting as partially-supervised multiclass classification where each instance is labeled ambiguously with more than one label. We show theoretically that effective learning is possible under reasonable assumptions even when all the data is weakly labeled. Motivated by the analysis, we propose a general convex learning formulation based on minimization of a surrogate loss appropriate for the ambiguous label setting. We apply our framework to identifying faces culled from Web news sources and to naming characters in TV series and movies. We experiment on a very large dataset consisting of 100 hours of video, and in particular achieve 6% error for character naming on 16 episodes of LOST. Timothée Cour, Benjamin Sapp, Christopher T. Jordan, Ben Taskar |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2008 | Movie/Script: Alignment and Parsing of Video and Text Transcription
Timothée Cour, Christopher T. Jordan, Eleni Miltsakaki, Ben Taskar |
ECCV (4) | 1 |
| 2007 | Recognizing objects by piecing together the Segmentation PuzzleabstractWe present an algorithm that recognizes objects of a given category using a small number of hand segmented images as references. Our method first over segments an input image into superpixels, and then finds a shortlist of optimal combinations of superpixels that best fit one of template parts, under affine transformations. Second, we develop a contextual interpretation of the parts, gluing image segments using top-down fiducial points, and checking overall shape similarity. In contrast to previous work, the search for candidate superpixel combinations is not exponential in the number of segments, and in fact leads to a very efficient detection scheme. Both the storage and the detection of templates only require space and time proportional to the length of the template boundary, allowing us to store potentially millions of templates, and to detect a template anywhere in a large image in roughly 0.01 seconds. We apply our algorithm on the Weizmann horse database, and show our method is comparable to the state of the art while offering a simpler and more efficient alternative compared to previous work. Timothée Cour, Jianbo Shi |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2006 | Balanced Graph MatchingabstractGraph matching is a fundamental problem in Computer Vision and Machine Learning. We present two contributions. First, we give a new spectral relaxation technique for approximate solutions to matching problems, that naturally incorporates one-to-one or one-to-many constraints within the relaxation scheme. The second is a normalization procedure for existing graph matching scoring functions that can dramatically improve the matching accuracy. It is based on a reinterpretation of the graph matching compatibility matrix as a bipartite graph on edges for which we seek a bistochastic normalization. We evaluate our two contributions on a comprehensive test set of random graph matching problems, as well as on image correspondence problem. Our normalization procedure can be used to improve the performance of many existing graph matching algorithms, including spectral matching, graduated assignment and semidefinite programming. Timothée Cour, Praveen Srinivasan, Jianbo Shi |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2005 | Spectral Segmentation with Multiscale Graph DecompositionabstractWe present a multiscale spectral image segmentation algorithm. In contrast to most multiscale image processing, this algorithm works on multiple scales of the image in parallel, without iteration, to capture both coarse and fine level details. The algorithm is computationally efficient, allowing to segment large images. We use the normalized cut graph partitioning framework of image segmentation. We construct a graph encoding pairwise pixel affinity, and partition the graph for image segmentation. We demonstrate that large image graphs can be compressed into multiple scales capturing image structure at increasingly large neighborhood. We show that the decomposition of the image segmentation graph into different scales can be determined by ecological statistics on the image grouping cues. Our segmentation algorithm works simultaneously across the graph scales, with an inter-scale constraint to ensure communication and consistency between the segmentations at each scale. As the results show, we incorporate long-range connections with linear-time complexity, providing high-quality segmentations efficiently. Images that previously could not be processed because of their size have been accurately segmented thanks to this method. Timothée Cour, Florence Bénézit, Jianbo Shi |
CVPR (2) | 1 |