Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emily Lynn Bishop

dblp:49/8368 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 77% Accessibility and assistive technology · 12% Human-robot interaction · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing › gait analysis
walking speed estimation
0.112010
Walking speed estimation using shank-mounted accelerometers · ICRA 2010
Wearable and physiological sensing
wearable sensing
0.112010
Walking speed estimation using shank-mounted accelerometers · ICRA 2010
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology
0.012010
Walking speed estimation using shank-mounted accelerometers · ICRA 2010
Human-robot interaction › physical human-robot interaction
prosthetic control
0.012010
Walking speed estimation using shank-mounted accelerometers · ICRA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inverted pendulum model · 0.1direct integration · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Walking speed estimation using shank-mounted accelerometers
abstract
We studied the feasibility of estimating walking speed using two shank-mounted accelerometers. Our approach took advantage of the inverted pendulum-like behavior of the stance leg during walking to identify a new method for dividing up walking into individual stride cycles and estimating the initial conditions for the direct integration of the accelerometer signals. To test its accuracy, we compared speed to known values during treadmill walking. The speed estimation method worked well across treadmill speeds yielding a root mean square speed estimation error of only 8%. This accuracy is comparable to that achieved from shank-mounted inertial measurement unit, providing a robust and low-cost alternative in using accelerometer for walking speed estimation. Shank-mounted accelerometer may be of great benefit for estimating speed in walking for the embedded control of knee-mounted devices such as prostheses and energy harvesters.
Emily Lynn Bishop, Qingguo Li
ICRA1