Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Igor Nitto

dblp:50/1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Coding theory · 66% Computational complexity · 18% Algorithms and data structures · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › source coding
lempel-ziv compression
0.322013
On the Bit-Complexity of Lempel-Ziv Compression · SIAM J. Comput. 2013
On the bit-complexity of Lempel-Ziv compression · SODA 2009
Computational complexity › complexity measures
bit complexity
0.222013
On the Bit-Complexity of Lempel-Ziv Compression · SIAM J. Comput. 2013
On the bit-complexity of Lempel-Ziv compression · SODA 2009
Coding theory › source coding › lossless compression
dictionary-based compression
0.212013
On the Bit-Complexity of Lempel-Ziv Compression · SIAM J. Comput. 2013
Coding theory › source coding
lossless compression
0.212013
On the Bit-Complexity of Lempel-Ziv Compression · SIAM J. Comput. 2013
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms
string algorithms
0.212013
On the Bit-Complexity of Lempel-Ziv Compression · SIAM J. Comput. 2013
Coding theory
source coding
0.112009
On the bit-complexity of Lempel-Ziv compression · SODA 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polynomial multiplication · 0.2dynamic programming · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 On the Bit-Complexity of Lempel-Ziv Compression
abstract
One of the most famous and investigated lossless data-compression schemes is the one introduced by Lempel and Ziv about 30 years ago [IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 23 (1977), pp. 337--343]. This compression scheme is known as “dictionary-based compressor” and consists of squeezing an input string by replacing some of its substrings with (shorter) codewords which are actually pointers to a dictionary of phrases built as the string is processed. Surprisingly enough, although many fundamental results are nowadays known about the speed and effectiveness of this compression process, “we are not aware of any parsing scheme that achieves optimality$\ldots$under any constraint on the codewords other than being of equal length” [N. Rajpoot and C. Sahinalp, in Handbook of Lossless Data Compression, Academic Press, New York, 2002, p. 159]. Here optimality means to achieve the minimum number of bits in compressing each individual input string without any assumption on its generating source. In this paper we investigate some issues pertaining to the bit-complexity of LZ77-based compressors, the most powerful variant of the LZ-compression scheme, and we design algorithms which achieve bit-optimality in the compressed output size by taking efficient/optimal time and optimal space.
Paolo Ferragina, Igor Nitto, Rossano Venturini
SIAM J. Comput.2
2011 On Optimally Partitioning a Text to Improve Its Compression
Paolo Ferragina, Igor Nitto, Rossano Venturini
Algorithmica2
2010 On compact representations of All-Pairs-Shortest-Path-Distance matrices
Paolo Ferragina, Igor Nitto, Rossano Venturini
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
2009 On Optimally Partitioning a Text to Improve Its Compression
Paolo Ferragina, Igor Nitto, Rossano Venturini
ESA2
2009 On the bit-complexity of Lempel-Ziv compression
abstract
One of the most famous and investigated lossless data-compression schemes is the one introduced by Lempel and Ziv about 30 years ago [37]. This compression scheme is known as “dictionary-based compressor” and consists of squeezing an input string by replacing some of its substrings with (shorter) codewords which are actually pointers to a dictionary of phrases built as the string is processed. Surprisingly enough, although many fundamental results are nowadays known about the speed and effectiveness of this compression process (see e.g. [23, 28] and references therein), “we are not aware of any parsing scheme that achieves optimality when the LZ77-dictionary is in use under any constraint on the codewords other than being of equal length” [28, pag. 159]. Here optimality means to achieve the minimum number of bits in compressing each individual input string, without any assumption on its generating source. In this paper we investigate three issues pertaining to the bit-complexity of LZ-based compressors, and we design algorithms which achieve bit-optimality in the compressed output size by taking efficient/optimal time and optimal space. These theoretical results will be sustained by some experiments that will compare our novel LZ-based compressors against the most popular compression tools (like gzip, bzip2) and state-of-the-art compressors (like the booster of [14, 13]).
Paolo Ferragina, Igor Nitto, Rossano Venturini
SODA2
2008 On Compact Representations of All-Pairs-Shortest-Path-Distance Matrices
Igor Nitto, Rossano Venturini
CPM1