Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthias Frisch

dblp:51/3409 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4234-8972ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
promoter analysis
0.112005
MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction
0.112005
MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation
0.012005
MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory network
0.012005
MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weight matrix · 0.1comparative analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Haplotype-based autoencoders can reduce the dataset dimension and estimate haplotype block effects in different crop species
abstract
BACKGROUND: In plant breeding, many studies currently investigate the application of machine learning (ML) to genomic prediction, hoping for an improvement in prediction accuracy compared to standard models like Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP). However, ML algorithms require much higher computational resources. This study aims to reduce the computational requirements and speed up training time by developing a novel autoencoder architecture inspired by haplotype blocks. Our approach incorporates prior knowledge on genetic linkage, inspired by haplotype block building, into the autoencoder architecture, resulting in a new encoded variable per haplotype block. We further modified our model into a semi-supervised version by adding available yield information. We used features extracted from the autoencoder’s block layer as inputs for Random Forest and GBLUP models to predict the yield of hybrid and inbred crops. RESULTS: Genomic prediction based on the extracted features maintained prediction accuracies equal to using the original marker data, even with a variable reduction of up to 98% and significantly reduced computation time. Prediction accuracy of the supervised component was in some cases equal to and in some lower than the prediction accuracy achieved using GBLUP. Effects estimated for haplotype block variants using our new method showed a high correlation to the blockwise sum of marker effects, which is the current standard approach for haplotype block effects. Correlation between the two block effect estimation approaches was very low for some blocks, which might indicate the incorporation of non-linear effects by the autoencoder. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach introduces a new perspective on processing haplotype blocks for genomic prediction, potentially providing more flexible modelling opportunities without the use of multiple binary dummy variables for each block variant. Additionally, training time for ML models may be significantly reduced by using the reduced feature sets generated using our method. By adding the semi-supervised component, the model is able to estimate values similar to marker effects for each block on yield. In future work, this may provide a new way of quantifying the importance of haplotype blocks for selection and breeding.
Philipp Georg Heilmann, Emanuel Grosch, Matthias Frisch, Matthias Herrmann, Steffen Beuch, Vivek Kurra, Martin Mascher, Raz Avni, Klaus Oldach, Ina Röhrs, Anja Hanemann, Raja Ram Mehta, Carsten Reinbrecht, Albrecht Serfling, Andreas Stahl, Marco Stucke, Amine Abbadi, Tobias Kox, Carola Zenke-Philippi
BMC Bioinform.3
2005 MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites
abstract
Motivation: Promoter analysis is an essential step on the way to identify regulatory networks. A prerequisite for successful promoter analysis is the prediction of potential transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) with reasonable accuracy. The next steps in promoter analysis can be tackled only with reliable predictions, e.g. finding phylogenetically conserved patterns or identifying higher order combinations of sites in promoters of co-regulated genes. Results: We present a new version of the program MatInspector that identifies TFBS in nucleotide sequences using a large library of weight matrices. By introducing a matrix family concept, optimized thresholds, and comparative analysis, the enhanced program produces concise results avoiding redundant and false-positive matches. We describe a number of programs based on MatInspector allowing in-depth promoter analysis (DiAlignTF, FrameWorker) and targeted design of regulatory sequences (SequenceShaper). Availability: MatInspector and the other programs described here can be used online at http://www.genomatix.de/matinspector.html. Access is free after registration within certain limitations (e.g. the number of analysis per month is currently limited to 20 analyses of arbitrary sequences). Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: http://www.genomatix.de/matinspector.html
K. Cartharius, Kornelie Frech, Korbinian Grote, Bernward Klocke, Manuela Haltmeier, Andreas Klingenhoff, Matthias Frisch, M. Bayerlein, Thomas Werner
Bioinform.7