Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Erik C. Carlson
dblp:51/6939
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers |
Electronic design automation · 50% Performance modeling and evaluation · 48% Parallel and multicore computing · 2% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
monte carlo methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Oil fields, hedge funds, and drugs · DAC 2009 |
Electronic design automation › timing analysis
statistical timing analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Oil fields, hedge funds, and drugs · DAC 2009 |
Electronic design automation
yield analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Oil fields, hedge funds, and drugs · DAC 2009 |
Electronic design automation
physical verification |
0.0 | 3 | 1990 | Design and Performance Evaluation of New Massively Parallel VLSI Mask Verification Algorithms in JIGSAW · DAC 1990 Mask Verification on the Connection Machine · DAC 1988 A Scanline Data Structure Processor for VLSI Geometry Checking · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1987 |
Electronic design automation › physical verification
mask verification |
0.0 | 2 | 1990 | Design and Performance Evaluation of New Massively Parallel VLSI Mask Verification Algorithms in JIGSAW · DAC 1990 Mask Verification on the Connection Machine · DAC 1988 |
Electronic design automation › physical design › layout verification
design rule checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | A Scanline Data Structure Processor for VLSI Geometry Checking · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1987 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | A Scanline Data Structure Processor for VLSI Geometry Checking · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1987 |
Electronic design automation › physical design
scanline algorithm |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | A Scanline Data Structure Processor for VLSI Geometry Checking · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1987 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallelization strategies
fine-grained parallelism |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Design and Performance Evaluation of New Massively Parallel VLSI Mask Verification Algorithms in JIGSAW · DAC 1990 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
massively parallel processing |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Mask Verification on the Connection Machine · DAC 1988 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
special-purpose processor |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | A Scanline Data Structure Processor for VLSI Geometry Checking · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
monte carlo method · 0.1multi-layer netlist extraction · 0.0mask flattening · 0.0scanline algorithm · 0.0hardware pipeline · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Oil fields, hedge funds, and drugsabstractStatistical analysis is a fundamental method in analysis, design, and optimization of large systems with uncertainties. It is being applied in drug development, analyzing financial markets, search for new oil fields, and many more areas. As the silicon process technology scales to its limits, uncertainty plays an increasing role and has made its way into tools such as yield analysis, statistical time analysis, etc. In this educational panel, we will start with a short tutorial on Monte Carlo methods including their use in EDA. Three experts from distinct application fields will then follow and discuss their experience in using Monte Carlo methods for solving large-scale problems in their domain. It may come as a surprise to some attendees of DAC to learn how much commonality there is between methods used in EDA and other field that seem far-fetched. Patrick Groeneveld, Rob A. Rutenbar, Jed W. Pitera, Erik C. Carlson |
DAC | 4 |
| 1990 | Design and Performance Evaluation of New Massively Parallel VLSI Mask Verification Algorithms in JIGSAWabstractThis paper describes JIGSAW, the massively parallel mask checking system that has evolved from our earlier feasibility study on large-scale, fine-grain parallelism in simple mask checking tasks [1]. Unlike previous systems, JIGSAW parallelizes all phases of the checking process. We describe new techniques to handle all-angle geometry, the first massively parallel mask flattening and multi-layer netlist extraction algorithms, and measurements made comparing JIGSAW, running on a Connection Machine, against industry-standard tools. End-to-end speedups, (i.e., from CIF to errors) range from 19 to 58 over DRACULA, with larger masks producing larger speedups. Erik C. Carlson, Rob A. Rutenbar |
DAC | 1 |
| 1988 | Mask Verification on the Connection Machine
Erik C. Carlson, Rob A. Rutenbar |
DAC | 1 |
| 1987 | A Scanline Data Structure Processor for VLSI Geometry CheckingabstractThis paper proposes an architecture to support VLSI geometry checking tasks based on scanline algorithms. Rather than recast the entire verification task in hardware, we identify primitives around which geometry checking tools can be built, and examine the feasibility of accelerating two of these critical primitives. We focus on the operations of Boolean combinations of mask layers, and region numbering within a mask layer. Unlike previous proposals for special hardware (e.g., bit map processors), this architecture operates on a more realistic representation of masks: a sorted stream of possibly oblique edges. The architecture can be viewed as directly interpreting the operators that manipulate the relevant scanline data structures. We show how the edge computations in these two algorithms can be restructured into the form of a single, shared hardware pipeline. Data from a simulation of this processor suggests that, relative to the specific software functions it is intended to replace, the scanline processor can reduce computation time significantly. In particular, simulations of one possible implementation for this processor yield speedups of three orders of magnitude for Manhattan mask data, degrading gracefully to speedups of two orders of magnitude for highly oblique mask data. Erik C. Carlson, Rob A. Rutenbar |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |