Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuki Maeda

dblp:52/1954 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 50% Recommender systems · 50%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › user interaction
user feedback
0.512021
ColorfulFeedback: Enhancing Interest Prediction Performance through Multi-dimensional Labeled Feedback from Users · WSDM 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

implicit feedback · 0.5explicit feedback · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Japanese Dataset for Aspect-based Sentiment Polarity Classification and Emotion Intensity Estimation
Kentaro Hanafusa, Kota Manabe, Yuki Maeda, Daisuke Maekawa, Tomoyuki Kajiwara, Hideaki Hayashi, Yuta Nakashima, Hajime Nagahara
LREC3
2021 ColorfulFeedback: Enhancing Interest Prediction Performance through Multi-dimensional Labeled Feedback from Users
abstract
Recommendation systems help to predict user demand and improve the quality of services offered. While the performance of a recommendation system depends on the quality and quantity of feedback from users, the two major approaches to feedback sacrifice quality for quantity or vice versa; implicit feedback is more abundant but less reliable, while explicit feedback is more credible but harder to collect. Although a hybrid approach has the potential to combine the strengths of both kinds of feedback, the existing approaches using explicit feedback are not suitable for such a combination. In this study, we design a novel feedback suitable for the hybrid approach and use it improve the performance of a recommendation system. The system enables us to collect more varied and less biased feedback from users. It improves performance without requiring major changes to the inference model. It also provides a unique and rich source of information of the model itself. We demonstrate an application of Colorful Feedback showing how it can improve an existing recommendation model.
Yuki Maeda, Shuji Yamaguchi, Tatsuru Higurashi, Kota Tsubouchi
WSDM1
2008 A Robot Assisted Hip Fracture Reduction with a Navigation System
Sanghyun Joung, Hirokazu Kamon, Hongen Liao, Junichiro Iwaki, Touji Nakazawa, Mamoru Mitsuishi, Yoshikazu Nakajima, Tsuyoshi Koyama, Nobuhiko Sugano, Yuki Maeda, Masahiko Bessho, Satoru Ohashi, Takuya Matsumoto, Isao Ohnishi, Ichiro Sakuma
MICCAI (2)10