Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William B. Gruttke
dblp:52/2959
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1970
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › numerical analysis › numerical integration
ordinary differential equation solver |
0.0 | 1 | 1970 | Pseudo-Runge-Kutta Methods of the Fifth Order · J. ACM 1970 |
Computational science and engineering › numerical solution of differential equations
runge-kutta methods |
0.0 | 1 | 1970 | Pseudo-Runge-Kutta Methods of the Fifth Order · J. ACM 1970 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parameter optimization · 0.0numerical integration · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970 | Pseudo-Runge-Kutta Methods of the Fifth OrderabstractA family of fifth-order pseudo-Runge-Kutta methods for the numerical solution of systems of ordinary differential equations is presented. A procedure for determining an “optimal” set of parameters is given, and several examples are considered. The principal advantage of these methods is that, for a fixed stepsize, they require two less function evaluations at each step than do the corresponding fifth-order Runge-Kutta methods. Their principal disadvantage is that they are not self-starting; they require two initial values. Numerically, pseudo-Runge-Kutta and Runge-Kutta methods seem to be comparable. William B. Gruttke |
J. ACM | 1 |