Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Suraj Nair 0001

dblp:52/5152-1 · also Suraj Rajappan Nair · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2283-7672ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Information retrieval · 94% Machine learning and data management · 6%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 38% Deep learning architectures and training · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval
3.052023
Neural Methods for Cross-Language Information Retrieval · SIGIR 2023
BLADE: Combining Vocabulary Pruning and Intermediate Pretraining for Scaleable Neural CLIR · SIGIR 2023
HC3: A Suite of Test Collections for CLIR Evaluation over Informal Text · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models
neural retrieval
1.222023
BLADE: Combining Vocabulary Pruning and Intermediate Pretraining for Scaleable Neural CLIR · SIGIR 2023
C3: Continued Pretraining with Contrastive Weak Supervision for Cross Language Ad-Hoc Retrieval · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.922023
HC3: A Suite of Test Collections for CLIR Evaluation over Informal Text · SIGIR 2023
Neural Methods for Cross-Language Information Retrieval · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › evaluation
test collection
0.922023
HC3: A Suite of Test Collections for CLIR Evaluation over Informal Text · SIGIR 2023
Neural Methods for Cross-Language Information Retrieval · SIGIR 2023
Machine learning and data management
active learning
0.712023
HC3: A Suite of Test Collections for CLIR Evaluation over Informal Text · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › evaluation
relevance judgment
0.712023
HC3: A Suite of Test Collections for CLIR Evaluation over Informal Text · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval
sparse feature learning
0.712023
BLADE: Combining Vocabulary Pruning and Intermediate Pretraining for Scaleable Neural CLIR · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models
sparse retrieval
0.712023
BLADE: Combining Vocabulary Pruning and Intermediate Pretraining for Scaleable Neural CLIR · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models
ad-hoc retrieval
0.612022
C3: Continued Pretraining with Contrastive Weak Supervision for Cross Language Ad-Hoc Retrieval · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
pre-trained language model for retrieval
0.612022
C3: Continued Pretraining with Contrastive Weak Supervision for Cross Language Ad-Hoc Retrieval · SIGIR 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.512021
Cross-language Sentence Selection via Data Augmentation and Rationale Training · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Information retrieval › cross-language information retrieval
query translation
0.412020
Combining Contextualized and Non-contextualized Query Translations to Improve CLIR · SIGIR 2020
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.412020
Combining Contextualized and Non-contextualized Query Translations to Improve CLIR · SIGIR 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.112021
Cross-language Sentence Selection via Data Augmentation and Rationale Training · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
rationale-based training
0.112021
Cross-language Sentence Selection via Data Augmentation and Rationale Training · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Information retrieval
translation probability estimation
0.112020
Combining Contextualized and Non-contextualized Query Translations to Improve CLIR · SIGIR 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse representation learning · 0.7shallow pooling · 0.7multilingual pre-trained language model · 0.7interactive search · 0.7weak supervision · 0.6contrastive learning · 0.6continued pretraining · 0.6rationale training · 0.5data augmentation · 0.5statistical machine translation · 0.4neural translation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Token Pruning Optimization for Efficient Multi-vector Dense Retrieval
Shanxiu He, Mutasem Al-Darabsah, Suraj Nair 0001, Jonathan May, Tarun Agarwal, Tao Yang 0009, Choon Hui Teo
ECIR (1)3
2023 HC3: A Suite of Test Collections for CLIR Evaluation over Informal Text
abstract
While there are many test collections for Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR), none of the large public test collections focus on short informal text documents. This paper introduces a new pair of CLIR test collections with millions of Chinese or Persian Tweets or Tweet threads as documents, sixty event-motivated topics written both in English and in each of the two document languages, and three-point graded relevance judgments constructed using interactive search and active learning. The design and construction of these new test collections are described, and baseline results are presented that demonstrate the utility of the collections for system evaluation. Shallow pooling is used to assess the efficacy of active learning to select documents for judgment.
Dawn J. Lawrie, James Mayfield, Douglas W. Oard, Eugene Yang 0001, Suraj Nair 0001, Petra Galuscáková
SIGIR5
2023 BLADE: Combining Vocabulary Pruning and Intermediate Pretraining for Scaleable Neural CLIR
abstract
Learning sparse representations using pretrained language models enhances the monolingual ranking effectiveness. Such representations are sparse vectors in the vocabulary of a language model projected from document terms. Extending such approaches to Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) using multilingual pretrained language models poses two challenges. First, the larger vocabularies of multilingual models affect both training and inference efficiency. Second, the representations of terms from different languages with similar meanings might not be sufficiently similar. To address these issues, we propose a learned sparse representation model, BLADE, combining vocabulary pruning with intermediate pre-training based on cross-language supervision. Our experiments reveal BLADE significantly reduces indexing time compared to its monolingual counterpart, SPLADE, on machine-translated documents, and it generates rankings with strengths complementary to those of other efficient CLIR methods.
Suraj Nair 0001, Eugene Yang 0001, Dawn J. Lawrie, James Mayfield, Douglas W. Oard
SIGIR1
2023 Neural Methods for Cross-Language Information Retrieval
abstract
This half day tutorial introduces the participant to the basic concepts underlying neural Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR). It discusses the most common algorithmic approaches to CLIR, focusing on modern neural methods; the history of CLIR; where to find and how to use CLIR training collections, test collections and baseline systems; how CLIR training and test collections are constructed; and open research questions in CLIR.
Eugene Yang 0001, Dawn J. Lawrie, James Mayfield, Suraj Nair 0001, Douglas W. Oard
SIGIR4
2022 Transfer Learning Approaches for Building Cross-Language Dense Retrieval Models
Suraj Nair 0001, Eugene Yang 0001, Dawn J. Lawrie, Kevin Duh, Paul McNamee, Kenton Murray, James Mayfield, Douglas W. Oard
ECIR (1)1
2022 C3: Continued Pretraining with Contrastive Weak Supervision for Cross Language Ad-Hoc Retrieval
abstract
Pretrained language models have improved effectiveness on numerous tasks, including ad-hoc retrieval. Recent work has shown that continuing to pretrain a language model with auxiliary objectives before fine-tuning on the retrieval task can further improve retrieval effectiveness. Unlike monolingual retrieval, designing an appropriate auxiliary task for cross-language mappings is challenging. To address this challenge, we use comparable Wikipedia articles in different languages to further pretrain off-the-shelf multilingual pretrained models before fine-tuning on the retrieval task. We show that our approach yields improvements in retrieval effectiveness.
Eugene Yang 0001, Suraj Nair 0001, Ramraj Chandradevan, Rebecca Iglesias-Flores, Douglas W. Oard
SIGIR2
2021 Cross-language Sentence Selection via Data Augmentation and Rationale Training
abstract
Yanda Chen, Chris Kedzie, Suraj Nair, Petra Galuscakova, Rui Zhang, Douglas Oard, Kathleen McKeown. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.
Yanda Chen, Chris Kedzie, Suraj Nair 0001, Petra Galuscáková, Rui Zhang 0037, Douglas W. Oard, Kathy McKeown
ACL/IJCNLP (1)3
2020 Combining Contextualized and Non-contextualized Query Translations to Improve CLIR
abstract
In cross-language information retrieval using probabilistic structured queries (PSQ), translation probabilities from statistical machine translation act as a bridge between the query and document vocabulary. These translation probabilities are typically estimated from a sentence-aligned corpus on a word to word basis without taking into account the context. Neural methods, by contrast, can learn to translate using the context around the words, and this can be used as a basis for estimating context-dependent translation probabilities. However, sparsity limits the accuracy of context-specific translation probabilities for rare words, which can be important in retrieval applications. This paper presents evidence that combining such context-dependent translation probabilities with context-independent translation probabilities learned from the same parallel corpus can yield improvements in the effectiveness of cross-language ranked retrieval.
Suraj Nair 0001, Petra Galuscáková, Douglas W. Oard
SIGIR1