Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Graham Z. Baker

dblp:52/8166 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis › static analysis
bug detection		 0.112010
Breadcrumbs: efficient context sensitivity for dynamic bug detection analyses · PLDI 2010
Program analysis
dynamic analysis		 0.112010
Breadcrumbs: efficient context sensitivity for dynamic bug detection analyses · PLDI 2010
Program analysis › static analysis › bug detection
dynamic bug detection		 0.112010
Breadcrumbs: efficient context sensitivity for dynamic bug detection analyses · PLDI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

context encoding · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 USBESAFE: An End-Point Solution to Protect Against USB-Based Attacks
Amin Kharraz, Brandon L. Daley, Graham Z. Baker, William K. Robertson, Engin Kirda
 RAID3
2010 Breadcrumbs: efficient context sensitivity for dynamic bug detection analyses
abstract
Calling context--the set of active methods on the stack--is critical for understanding the dynamic behavior of large programs. Dynamic program analysis tools, however, are almost exclusively context insensitive because of the prohibitive cost of representing calling contexts at run time. Deployable dynamic analyses, in particular, have been limited to reporting only static program locations.
Michael D. Bond, Graham Z. Baker, Samuel Z. Guyer
 PLDI2