Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stuart Young
dblp:54/1495
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 24% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 19% Multi-agent systems · 19% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
adaptive sampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-robot coordination through dynamic Voronoi partitioning for informative adaptive sampling in communication-constrained environments · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › navigation planning
informative path planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-robot coordination through dynamic Voronoi partitioning for informative adaptive sampling in communication-constrained environments · ICRA 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot coordination |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-robot coordination through dynamic Voronoi partitioning for informative adaptive sampling in communication-constrained environments · ICRA 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
multi-robot exploration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-robot coordination through dynamic Voronoi partitioning for informative adaptive sampling in communication-constrained environments · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning
voronoi partition |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-robot coordination through dynamic Voronoi partitioning for informative adaptive sampling in communication-constrained environments · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
environment modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-robot coordination through dynamic Voronoi partitioning for informative adaptive sampling in communication-constrained environments · ICRA 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic voronoi partitioning · 0.3decentralized coordination · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Multi-robot coordination through dynamic Voronoi partitioning for informative adaptive sampling in communication-constrained environmentsabstractAutonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are cost- and time-efficient systems for environmental sampling. Informative adaptive sampling has been shown to be an effective method of sampling a lake or ocean for environmental modeling. In this paper, we focus on multi-robot coordination for informative adaptive sampling. We use a dynamic Voronoi partitioning approach whereby the vehicles, in a decentralized fashion, repeatedly calculate weighted Voronoi partitions for the space. Each vehicle then runs informative adaptive sampling within their partition. The vehicles can request surfacing events to share data between vehicles. Simulation results show that the addition of the coordination with dynamic Voronoi partitioning results in obtaining higher quality models faster. Thus we created a decentralized, multi-robot coordination approach for informative, adaptive sampling of unknown environments. Stephanie Kemna, John G. Rogers III, Carlos Nieto-Granda, Stuart Young, Gaurav S. Sukhatme |
ICRA | 4 |
| 1999 | Who wants to learn online?abstractA study of how different demographic groups find the experience of flexible online learning. A first year course in Internet & Web Design is offered to a diverse range of students in traditional and online formats. We hope to draw conclusions about which groups find online learning works for them. Stuart Young, Ross Dewstow, Mae McSporran |
ITiCSE | 1 |