Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carina Andersson 0001

dblp:54/2889-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
0000-0001-5702-292XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 5 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 67% Software testing · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
fault density
0.112007
A Replicated Quantitative Analysis of Fault Distributions in Complex Software Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2007
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.112007
A Replicated Quantitative Analysis of Fault Distributions in Complex Software Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2007
Software testing
software reliability
0.112007
A Replicated Quantitative Analysis of Fault Distributions in Complex Software Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

replication study · 0.1hypothesis testing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Investigating Test Teams' Defect Detection in Function test
abstract
Art. 4343715
Carina Andersson 0001, Per Runeson
ESEM1
2007 A replicated empirical study of a selection method for software reliability growth models
Carina Andersson 0001
Empir. Softw. Eng.1
2007 A Replicated Quantitative Analysis of Fault Distributions in Complex Software Systems
abstract
To contribute to the body of empirical research on fault distributions during development of complex software systems, a replication of a study of Fenton and Ohlsson is conducted. The hypotheses from the original study are investigated using data taken from an environment that differs in terms of system size, project duration, and programming language. We have investigated four sets of hypotheses on data from three successive telecommunications projects: 1) the Pareto principle, that is, a small number of modules contain a majority of the faults (in the replication, the Pareto principle is confirmed), 2) fault persistence between test phases (a high fault incidence in function testing is shown to imply the same in system testing, as well as prerelease versus postrelease fault incidence), 3) the relation between number of faults and lines of code (the size relation from the original study could be neither confirmed nor disproved in the replication), and 4) fault density similarities across test phases and projects (in the replication study, fault densities are confirmed to be similar across projects). Through this replication study, we have contributed to what is known on fault distributions, which seem to be stable across environments.
Carina Andersson 0001, Per Runeson
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
2004 Evaluation of Usage-Based Reading-Conclusions after Three Experiments
Thomas Thelin, Per Runeson, Claes Wohlin, Thomas Olsson 0001, Carina Andersson 0001
Empir. Softw. Eng.5
2003 Test processes in software product evolution - a qualitative survey on the state of practice
abstract
Abstract In order to understand the state of test process practices in the software industry, we have conducted a qualitative survey, covering software development departments at 11 companies in Sweden of different sizes and application domains. The companies develop products in an evolutionary manner, which means either new versions are released regularly, or new product variants under new names are released. The survey was conducted through workshop and interview sessions, loosely guided by a questionnaire scheme. The main conclusions of the survey are that the documented development process is emphasized by larger organizations as a key asset, while smaller organizations tend to lean more on experienced people. Further, product volution is performed primarily as new product variants for embedded systems, and as new versions for packaged software. The development is structured using incremental development or a daily build approach; increments are used among more process‐focused organizations, and daily build is more frequently utilized in less process‐focused organizations. Test automation is performed using scripts for products with focus on functionality, and recorded data for products with focus on non‐functional properties. Test automation is an issue which most organizations want to improve; handling the legacy parts of the product and related documentation presents a common problem in improvement efforts for product evolution. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Per Runeson, Carina Andersson 0001, Martin Höst
J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.2