Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
A. K. Datta
dblp:54/4977
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Speech recognition and synthesis · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition › phoneme recognition
vowel recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Maximum Likelihood Methods in Vowel Recognition: A Comparative Study · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1982 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum likelihood ratio · 0.0euclidean distance discriminant · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Do ear perceive vowel through formants?
A. K. Datta |
EUROSPEECH | 1 |
| 1991 | Nasalisation in bengali speech sounds acoustic-phonetic study
A. K. Datta, N. R. Ganguli, B. Mukherjee |
EUROSPEECH | 1 |
| 1991 | A hierarchical perception-linked model for machine recognition of phonemes
A. K. Datta, N. R. Ganguli, Anuradha Ray, B. Mukherjee |
Inf. Sci. | 1 |
| 1989 | Manner-based labelling of speech signal using total energy profile
A. K. Datta |
EUROSPEECH | 1 |
| 1987 | An expert system for key syllable based isolated word recognition
A. K. Datta, Anuradha Ray, N. R. Ganguli |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 1 |
| 1982 | Maximum Likelihood Methods in Vowel Recognition: A Comparative StudyabstractVowel classification accuracy is studied using a generalized maximum likelihood ratio method. It is shown that two simplifying assumptions can reduce computation times by as much as a factor of five while producing practically no change in recognition accuracy. The two simplifying assumptions remove cross correlation terms and produce an Euclidean distance discriminant function. The vowels are taken from 350 multisyllabic isolated words spoken by five male speakers. The vowels occur in a variety of preand postconsonantal contexts. The recognition scores obtained for vowels are 83 percent. The effect of grouping of similar vowels on recognition scores is found to be marginal. The high back and high front vowels show better recognition scores (92-94 percent). In general, recognition performance for individual vowels follows a definite trend with respect to. the vowel diagram. A reasonable similarity is observed between confusion matrix and the distribution of vowels in first and second formant frequency (F1 F2) plane. A. K. Datta, N. R. Ganguli |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 1980 | A self-supervised vowel recognition system
Sankar K. Pal, A. K. Datta, D. Dutta Majumder |
Pattern Recognit. | 2 |