Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim R. Mercer

dblp:55/7241 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-8780-894XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA processing
branchpoint prediction
0.312018
Machine learning annotation of human branchpoints · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation
0.312018
Machine learning annotation of human branchpoints · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
next-generation sequencing data analysis
0.312017
ANAQUIN: a software toolkit for the analysis of spike-in controls for next generation sequencing · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing data processing
sequencing quality control
0.312017
ANAQUIN: a software toolkit for the analysis of spike-in controls for next generation sequencing · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › clinical bioinformatics
genetic variant interpretation
0.112018
Machine learning annotation of human branchpoints · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical programming · 0.3machine learning · 0.3diagnostic statistics · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Machine learning annotation of human branchpoints
abstract
Motivation: The branchpoint element is required for the first lariat-forming reaction in splicing. However current catalogues of human branchpoints remain incomplete due to the difficulty in experimentally identifying these splicing elements. To address this limitation, we have developed a machine-learning algorithm-branchpointer-to identify branchpoint elements solely from gene annotations and genomic sequence. Results: Using branchpointer, we annotate branchpoint elements in 85% of human gene introns with sensitivity (61.8%) and specificity (97.8%). In addition to annotation, branchpointer can evaluate the impact of SNPs on branchpoint architecture to inform functional interpretation of genetic variants. Branchpointer identifies all published deleterious branchpoint mutations annotated in clinical variant databases, and finds thousands of additional clinical and common genetic variants with similar predicted effects. This genome-wide annotation of branchpoints provides a reference for the genetic analysis of splicing, and the interpretation of noncoding variation. Availability and implementation: Branchpointer is written and implemented in the statistical programming language R and is freely available under a BSD license as a package through Bioconductor. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Bethany Signal, Brian S. Gloss, Marcel E. Dinger, Tim R. Mercer
Bioinform.4
2017 ANAQUIN: a software toolkit for the analysis of spike-in controls for next generation sequencing
abstract
Abstract Summary Spike-in controls are synthetic nucleic-acid sequences that are added to a user’s sample and constitute internal standards for subsequent steps in the next generation sequencing workflow. The Anaquin software toolkit can be used to analyze the performance of spike-in controls at multiple steps during RNA sequencing or genome sequencing analysis, providing useful diagnostic statistics, data visualization and sample normalization. Availability and Implementation The software is implemented in C ++/R and is freely available under BSD license. The source code is available from github.com/student-t/Anaquin, binaries and user manual from www.sequin.xyz/software and R package from bioconductor.org/packages/Anaquin Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Ted Wong, Ira W. Deveson, Simon A. Hardwick, Tim R. Mercer
Bioinform.4
2008 Differentiating Protein-Coding and Noncoding RNA: Challenges and Ambiguities
abstract
The assumption that RNA can be readily classified into either protein-coding or non-protein-coding categories has pervaded biology for close to 50 years. Until recently, discrimination between these two categories was relatively straightforward: most transcripts were clearly identifiable as protein-coding messenger RNAs (mRNAs), and readily distinguished from the small number of well-characterized non-protein-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), such as transfer, ribosomal, and spliceosomal RNAs. Recent genome-wide studies have revealed the existence of thousands of noncoding transcripts, whose function and significance are unclear. The discovery of this hidden transcriptome and the implicit challenge it presents to our understanding of the expression and regulation of genetic information has made the need to distinguish between mRNAs and ncRNAs both more pressing and more complicated. In this Review, we consider the diverse strategies employed to discriminate between protein-coding and noncoding transcripts and the fundamental difficulties that are inherent in what may superficially appear to be a simple problem. Misannotations can also run in both directions: some ncRNAs may actually encode peptides, and some of those currently thought to do so may not. Moreover, recent studies have shown that some RNAs can function both as mRNAs and intrinsically as functional ncRNAs, which may be a relatively widespread phenomenon. We conclude that it is difficult to annotate an RNA unequivocally as protein-coding or noncoding, with overlapping protein-coding and noncoding transcripts further confounding this distinction. In addition, the finding that some transcripts can function both intrinsically at the RNA level and to encode proteins suggests a false dichotomy between mRNAs and ncRNAs. Therefore, the functionality of any transcript at the RNA level should not be discounted.
Marcel E. Dinger, Ken C. Pang, Tim R. Mercer, John S. Mattick
PLoS Comput. Biol.3