Accurately assigning phenotype information to individual patients via computational phenotyping using Electronic Health Records (EHRs) has been seen as the first step towards enabling EHRs for precision medicine research. Chart review labels annotated by clinical experts, also known as “gold standard” labels, are essential for the development and validation of computational phenotyping algorithms. However, given the complexity of EHR systems, the process of chart review is both labor intensive and time consuming. We propose a fully automated algorithm, referred to as pGUESS, to rank EHR notes according to their relevance to a given phenotype. By identifying the most relevant notes, pGUESS can greatly improve the efficiency and accuracy of chart reviews. pGUESS uses prior guided semantic similarity to measure the informativeness of a clinical note to a given phenotype. We first select candidate clinical concepts from a pool of comprehensive medical concepts using public knowledge sources and then derive the semantic embedding vector (SEV) for a reference article (SEVref) and each note (SEVnote). The algorithm scores the relevance of a note as the cosine similarity between SEVnote and SEVref. The algorithm was validated against four sets of 200 notes that were manually annotated by clinical experts to assess their informativeness to one of three disease phenotypes. pGUESS algorithm substantially outperforms existing unsupervised approaches for classifying the relevance status with respect to both accuracy and scalability across phenotypes. Averaging over the three phenotypes, the rank correlation between the algorithm ranking and gold standard label was 0.64 for pGUESS, but only 0.47 and 0.35 for the next two best performing algorithms. pGUESS is also much more computationally scalable compared to existing algorithms. pGUESS algorithm can substantially reduce the burden of chart review and holds potential in improving the efficiency and accuracy of human annotation.

OBJECTIVE: Electronic Health Record (EHR) based phenotyping is a crucial yet challenging problem in the biomedical field. Though clinicians typically determine patient-level diagnoses via manual chart review, the sheer volume and heterogeneity of EHR data renders such tasks challenging, time-consuming, and prohibitively expensive, thus leading to a scarcity of clinical annotations in EHRs. Weakly supervised learning algorithms have been successfully applied to various EHR phenotyping problems, due to their ability to leverage information from large quantities of unlabeled samples to better inform predictions based on a far smaller number of patients. However, most weakly supervised methods are subject to the challenge to choose the right cutoff value to generate an optimal classifier. Furthermore, since they only utilize the most informative features (i.e., main ICD and NLP counts) they may fail for episodic phenotypes that cannot be consistently detected via ICD and NLP data. In this paper, we propose a label-efficient, weakly semi-supervised deep learning algorithm for EHR phenotyping (WSS-DL), which overcomes the limitations above. MATERIALS AND METHODS: WSS-DL classifies patient-level disease status through a series of learning stages: 1) generating silver standard labels, 2) deriving enhanced-silver-standard labels by fitting a weakly supervised deep learning model to data with silver standard labels as outcomes and high dimensional EHR features as input, and 3) obtaining the final prediction score and classifier by fitting a supervised learning model to data with a minimal number of gold standard labels as the outcome, and the enhanced-silver-standard labels and a minimal set of most informative EHR features as input. To assess the generalizability of WSS-DL across different phenotypes and medical institutions, we apply WSS-DL to classify a total of 17 diseases, including both acute and chronic conditions, using EHR data from three healthcare systems. Additionally, we determine the minimum quantity of training labels required by WSS-DL to outperform existing supervised and semi-supervised phenotyping methods. RESULTS: The proposed method, in combining the strengths of deep learning and weakly semi-supervised learning, successfully leverages the crucial phenotyping information contained in EHR features from unlabeled samples. Indeed, the deep learning model's ability to handle high-dimensional EHR features allows it to generate strong phenotype status predictions from silver standard labels. These predictions, in turn, provide highly effective features in the final logistic regression stage, leading to high phenotyping accuracy in notably small subsets of labeled data (e.g. n = 40 labeled samples). CONCLUSION: Our method's high performance in EHR datasets with very small numbers of labels indicates its potential value in aiding doctors to diagnose rare diseases as well as conditions susceptible to misdiagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: Multimodal automated phenotyping (MAP) is a scalable, high-throughput phenotyping method, developed using electronic health record (EHR) data from an adult population. We tested transportability of MAP to a pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Without additional feature engineering or supervised training, we applied MAP to a pediatric population enrolled in a biobank and evaluated performance against physician-reviewed medical records. We also compared performance of MAP at the pediatric institution and the original adult institution where MAP was developed, including for 6 phenotypes validated at both institutions against physician-reviewed medical records. RESULTS: MAP performed equally well in the pediatric setting (average AUC 0.98) as it did at the general adult hospital system (average AUC 0.96). MAP's performance in the pediatric sample was similar across the 6 specific phenotypes also validated against gold-standard labels in the adult biobank. CONCLUSIONS: MAP is highly transportable across diverse populations and has potential for wide-scale use.

OBJECTIVE: The Consortium for Clinical Characterization of COVID-19 by EHR (4CE) is an international collaboration addressing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with federated analyses of electronic health record (EHR) data. We sought to develop and validate a computable phenotype for COVID-19 severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve 4CE sites participated. First, we developed an EHR-based severity phenotype consisting of 6 code classes, and we validated it on patient hospitalization data from the 12 4CE clinical sites against the outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or death. We also piloted an alternative machine learning approach and compared selected predictors of severity with the 4CE phenotype at 1 site. RESULTS: The full 4CE severity phenotype had pooled sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity 0.83 for the combined outcome of ICU admission and/or death. The sensitivity of individual code categories for acuity had high variability-up to 0.65 across sites. At one pilot site, the expert-derived phenotype had mean area under the curve of 0.903 (95% confidence interval, 0.886-0.921), compared with an area under the curve of 0.956 (95% confidence interval, 0.952-0.959) for the machine learning approach. Billing codes were poor proxies of ICU admission, with as low as 49% precision and recall compared with chart review. DISCUSSION: We developed a severity phenotype using 6 code classes that proved resilient to coding variability across international institutions. In contrast, machine learning approaches may overfit hospital-specific orders. Manual chart review revealed discrepancies even in the gold-standard outcomes, possibly owing to heterogeneous pandemic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an EHR-based severity phenotype for COVID-19 in hospitalized patients and validated it at 12 international sites.

OBJECTIVE: Real-world data (RWD) are increasingly used for pharmacoepidemiology and regulatory innovation. Our objective was to compare adverse drug event (ADE) rates determined from two RWD sources, electronic health records and administrative claims data, among children treated with drugs for pulmonary hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Textual mentions of medications and signs/symptoms that may represent ADEs were identified in clinical notes using natural language processing. Diagnostic codes for the same signs/symptoms were identified in our electronic data warehouse for the patients with textual evidence of taking pulmonary hypertension-targeted drugs. We compared rates of ADEs identified in clinical notes to those identified from diagnostic code data. In addition, we compared putative ADE rates from clinical notes to those from a healthcare claims dataset from a large, national insurer. RESULTS: Analysis of clinical notes identified up to 7-fold higher ADE rates than those ascertained from diagnostic codes. However, certain ADEs (eg, hearing loss) were more often identified in diagnostic code data. Similar results were found when ADE rates ascertained from clinical notes and national claims data were compared. DISCUSSION: While administrative claims and clinical notes are both increasingly used for RWD-based pharmacovigilance, ADE rates substantially differ depending on data source. CONCLUSION: Pharmacovigilance based on RWD may lead to discrepant results depending on the data source analyzed. Further work is needed to confirm the validity of identified ADEs, to distinguish them from disease effects, and to understand tradeoffs in sensitivity and specificity between data sources.

A periodic transmission of a short resetting sequence used to "fill up" the decision-feedback equalizer feedback filter memory with correct symbols is proposed to reduce the propagation error. Two strategies are considered: full and partial reset, where the entire memory and some part of it is reset, respectively. For any given steady-state bit-error rate, the period of the resetting sequence is found by use of the Markov chain limit theorem. It is shown, via an illustrative example, that for low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the resetting strategy outperforms Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghen (BCH) code with the same code rate. Moreover, a joint resetting and error correction coding strategy is considered, which is better than BCH code for low and medium SNR.