Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Scott Stornetta

dblp:56/2563 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 94% User interface design and tools · 6%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-mediated communication
0.021992
Beyond Being There · CHI 1992
Supporting Informal Communication via Ephemeral Interest Groups · CSCW 1992
Collaborative and social computing › interpersonal communication
informal communication
0.011992
Supporting Informal Communication via Ephemeral Interest Groups · CSCW 1992
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
media richness
0.011992
Beyond Being There · CHI 1992
User interface design and tools
interaction design
0.011992
Beyond Being There · CHI 1992
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
online discussion
0.011992
Supporting Informal Communication via Ephemeral Interest Groups · CSCW 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

design exploration · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Beyond Being There
abstract
A belief in the efficacy of imitating face-to-face communication is an unquestioned presupposition of most current work on supporting communications in electronic media. In this paper we highlight problems with this presupposition and present an alternative proposal for grounding and motivating research and development that frames the issue in terms of needs, media, and mechanisms. To help elaborate the proposal we sketch a series of example projects and respond to potential criticisms.
James D. Hollan, Scott Stornetta
CHI2
1992 Supporting Informal Communication via Ephemeral Interest Groups
abstract
In this paper, we introduce ephemeral interest groups for supporting informal communication. Ephemeral interest groups are electronic discussion groups that, in contrast to bulletin boards and the like, are short-lived and ad hoc. They are designed as a medium for informal discussions of items broadcast to a wider community. We have implemented a prototype system to explore ephemeral interest groups. We discuss the goals of the system, characterize its evolution over the last ten months of deployment, and sketch our plans for future developments.
Laurence Brothers, James D. Hollan, Jakob Neilsen, Scott Stornetta, Steven P. Abney, George W. Furnas, Michael L. Littman
CSCW4