Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Colin S. Gillespie
dblp:56/3021
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0003-1787-0275ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
annotation quality assessment |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | An approach to describing and analysing bulk biological annotation quality: a case study using UniProtKB · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | The SBML discrete stochastic models test suite · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › model exchange format
systems biology model exchange |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Tools for the SBML Community · Bioinform. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zipf's principle of least effort · 0.1power law distribution · 0.1stochastic simulation · 0.1numerical methods · 0.1SBML · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | An approach to describing and analysing bulk biological annotation quality: a case study using UniProtKBabstractMOTIVATION: Annotations are a key feature of many biological databases, used to convey our knowledge of a sequence to the reader. Ideally, annotations are curated manually, however manual curation is costly, time consuming and requires expert knowledge and training. Given these issues and the exponential increase of data, many databases implement automated annotation pipelines in an attempt to avoid un-annotated entries. Both manual and automated annotations vary in quality between databases and annotators, making assessment of annotation reliability problematic for users. The community lacks a generic measure for determining annotation quality and correctness, which we look at addressing within this article. Specifically we investigate word reuse within bulk textual annotations and relate this to Zipf's Principle of Least Effort. We use the UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) as a case study to demonstrate this approach since it allows us to compare annotation change, both over time and between automated and manually curated annotations. RESULTS: By applying power-law distributions to word reuse in annotation, we show clear trends in UniProtKB over time, which are consistent with existing studies of quality on free text English. Further, we show a clear distinction between manual and automated analysis and investigate cohorts of protein records as they mature. These results suggest that this approach holds distinct promise as a mechanism for judging annotation quality. AVAILABILITY: Source code is available at the authors website: http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/m.j.bell1/annotation. CONTACT: [email protected]. Michael J. Bell, Colin S. Gillespie, Daniel C. Swan, Phillip Lord |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2011 | Ten Simple Rules for Getting Help from Online Scientific CommunitiesabstractInternational audience Giovanni Marco Dall'Olio, Jacopo Marino, Michael Schubert, Kevin L. Keys, Melanie I. Stefan, Colin S. Gillespie, Pierre Poulain, Khader Shameer, Robert Sugar, Brandon M. Invergo, Lars Juhl Jensen, Jaume Bertranpetit, Hafid Laayouni |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 6 |
| 2010 | CaliBayes and BASIS: integrated tools for the calibration, simulation and storage of biological simulation modelsabstractDynamic simulation modelling of complex biological processes forms the backbone of systems biology. Discrete stochastic models are particularly appropriate for describing sub-cellular molecular interactions, especially when critical molecular species are thought to be present at low copy-numbers. For example, these stochastic effects play an important role in models of human ageing, where ageing results from the long-term accumulation of random damage at various biological scales. Unfortunately, realistic stochastic simulation of discrete biological processes is highly computationally intensive, requiring specialist hardware, and can benefit greatly from parallel and distributed approaches to computation and analysis. For these reasons, we have developed the BASIS system for the simulation and storage of stochastic SBML models together with associated simulation results. This system is exposed as a set of web services to allow users to incorporate its simulation tools into their workflows. Parameter inference for stochastic models is also difficult and computationally expensive. The CaliBayes system provides a set of web services (together with an R package for consuming these and formatting data) which addresses this problem for SBML models. It uses a sequential Bayesian MCMC method, which is powerful and flexible, providing very rich information. However this approach is exceptionally computationally intensive and requires the use of a carefully designed architecture. Again, these tools are exposed as web services to allow users to take advantage of this system. In this article, we describe these two systems and demonstrate their integrated use with an example workflow to estimate the parameters of a simple model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth on agar plates. Yuhui Chen, Conor Lawless, Colin S. Gillespie, Jake Wu, Richard J. Boys, Darren J. Wilkinson |
Briefings Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2008 | The SBML discrete stochastic models test suiteabstractMOTIVATION: Stochastic simulation is a very important tool for mathematical modelling. However, it is difficult to check the correctness of a stochastic simulator, since any two realizations from a single model will typically be different. RESULTS: We have developed a test suite of stochastic models that have been solved either analytically or using numerical methods. This allows the accuracy of stochastic simulators to be tested against known results. The test suite is already being used by a number of stochastic simulator developers. AVAILABILITY: The latest version of the test suite can be obtained from http://www.calibayes.ncl.ac.uk/Resources/dsmts/ and is licensed under GNU Lesser General Public License. Thomas W. Evans, Colin S. Gillespie, Darren J. Wilkinson |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2006 | Tools for the SBML CommunityabstractMOTIVATION: SBML is quickly becoming the standard format to exchange biochemical models. The tools presented in this paper are loosely-coupled, and are intended to be incorporated into SBML aware applications. The rationale for this is to reduce the amount of repeated work carried out within the community and to create tools that offer a greater number of features to the end-user. AVAILABILITY: All tools described are available from http://www.basis.ncl.ac.uk/software and are licensed under GNU General Public License. Colin S. Gillespie, Darren J. Wilkinson, Carole J. Proctor, Daryl P. Shanley, Richard J. Boys, Thomas B. L. Kirkwood |
Bioinform. | 1 |