Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ralph Neuneier
dblp:56/4953
· DBLP profile ↗
20ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 42% Deep learning architectures and training · 32% Time series and sequential data · 14% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational finance and economics › portfolio construction
asset allocation |
0.0 | 2 | 1997 | Enhancing Q-Learning for Optimal Asset Allocation · NIPS 1997 Optimal Asset Allocation using Adaptive Dynamic Programming · NIPS 1995 |
Computational finance and economics
portfolio management |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Active Portfolio-Management based on Error Correction Neural Networks · NIPS 2001 |
Computational finance and economics › portfolio management
portfolio optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Active Portfolio-Management based on Error Correction Neural Networks · NIPS 2001 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
risk-sensitive reinforcement learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Risk Sensitive Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 1998 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Enhancing Q-Learning for Optimal Asset Allocation · NIPS 1997 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | The Observer-Observation Dilemma in Neuro-Forecasting · NIPS 1997 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | The Observer-Observation Dilemma in Neuro-Forecasting · NIPS 1997 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming
adaptive dynamic programming |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Optimal Asset Allocation using Adaptive Dynamic Programming · NIPS 1995 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
missing data |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Training Neural Networks with Deficient Data · NIPS 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
error correction neural network · 0.0q-learning · 0.0mean-variance optimization · 0.0black-litterman model · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0parzen window density estimation · 0.0backpropagation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Improving Semantic Consistency of Web Sites by Quantifying User Intent
Carsten Stolz, Maximilian Viermetz, Michal Skubacz, Ralph Neuneier |
ICWE | 4 |
| 2005 | Guidance Performance Indicator - Web Metrics for Information Driven Web SitesabstractFor the evaluation of Web sites, a multitude of metrics are available. Apart from general statistical measures, success metrics reflect the degree to which a Web site achieves its defined objectives. Particularly metrics for e-commerce sites based on transaction analysis are commonly available and well understood. In contrast to transaction based sites, the success of Web sites geared toward information delivery is harder to quantify since there is no direct feedback of user intent. User feedback is only directly available on transactional Web sites. We introduce a metric to measure the success of an information driven Web site in meeting its objective to deliver the desired information in a timely and usable fashion. We propose to assign a value to each click based on the type of transition, duration and semantic distance. These values are then combined into a scoring model describing the success of a Web site in meeting its objectives. The resulting metric is introduced as the GPI and its applicability shown on a large corporate Web site. Carsten Stolz, Maximilian Viermetz, Michal Skubacz, Ralph Neuneier |
Web Intelligence | 4 |
| 2004 | Measuring Semantic Relations of Web Sites by Clustering of Local Context
Carsten Stolz, Vassil Gedov, Ralph Neuneier, Michal Skubacz |
ICWE | 4 |
| 2002 | Undershooting: modeling dynamical systems by time grid refinements
Hans-Georg Zimmermann, Ralph Neuneier, Ralph Grothmann |
ESANN | 2 |
| 2002 | Market Modeling Based on Cognitive Agents
Georg Zimmermann, Ralph Grothmann, Christoph Tietz, Ralph Neuneier |
ICANN | 4 |
| 2002 | Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning
Oliver Mihatsch, Ralph Neuneier |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2001 | Multi-agent FX-Market Modeling Based on Cognitive Systems
Hans-Georg Zimmermann, Ralph Neuneier, Ralph Grothmann |
ICANN | 2 |
| 2001 | Active Portfolio-Management based on Error Correction Neural NetworksabstractThis paper deals with a neural network architecture which establishes a portfolio management system similar to the Black / Litterman approach. This allocation scheme distributes funds across various securities or fi- nancial markets while simultaneously complying with specific allocation constraints which meet the requirements of an investor. The portfolio optimization algorithm is modeled by a feedforward neural network. The underlying expected return forecasts are based on error correction neural networks (ECNN), which utilize the last model error as an auxiliary input to evaluate their own misspecification. The portfolio optimization is implemented such that (i.) the allocations comply with investor’s constraints and that (ii.) the risk of the portfo- lio can be controlled. We demonstrate the profitability of our approach by constructing internationally diversified portfolios across different financial markets of the G7 contries. It turns out, that our approach is superior to a preset benchmark portfolio. 1 Introduction: Portfolio-Management We integrate the portfolio optimization algorithm suggested by Black / Litterman [1] into a neural network architecture. Combining the mean-variance theory [5] with the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) [7], this approach utilizes excess returns of the CAPM equilibrium to define a neutral, well balanced benchmark portfolio. Deviations from the benchmark allocation are only allowed within preset boundaries. Hence, as an advantage, there are no unrealistic solutions (e. g. large short positions, huge portfolio changes). Moreover, there is no need of formulating return expectations for all assets. In contrast to Black / Litterman, excess return forecasts are estimated by time-delay recur- rent error correction neural networks [8]. Investment decisions which comply with given allocation constraints are derived from these predictions. The risk exposure of the portfolio is implicitly controlled by a parameter-optimizing task over time (sec. 3 and 5). Our approach consists of the following three steps: (i.) Construction of forecast models on the basis of error correction neural networks (ECNN) for all assets (sec. 2). To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]. (sec. 3 and 4). By this, the profitability of an asset with respect to all others is measured. (ii.) Computation of excess returns (iii.) Optimization of the investment proportions Allocation constraints ensure, that the investment proportions by a higher-level feedforward network on the basis of the excess returns. may deviate from a given benchmark only within predefined intervals (sec. 3 and 4). Finally, we apply our neural network based portfolio management system to an asset allo- cation problem concerning the G7 countries (sec. 6). 2 Forecasting by Error Correction Neural Networks Most dynamical systems are driven by a superposition of autonomous development and external influences [8]. For discrete time grids, such a dynamics can be described by a recurrent state transition and an output equation (Eq. 1). state transition eq. output eq. Hans-Georg Zimmermann, Ralph Neuneier, Ralph Grothmann |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2001 | Multi-agent modeling of multiple FX-markets by neural networksabstractWe introduce an explanatory multi-agent approach of multiple FX-market modeling based on neural networks. We consider the explicit and implicit dynamics of the market price. This paper extends previous work of modeling a single FX-market to an integrated approach, which allows one to treat several FX-markets simultaneously. Our approach is based on feedforward neural networks. Neural networks allow the fitting of high-dimensional nonlinear models, which is often utilized in econometrics. Merging the economic theory of multi-agents with neural networks, our model concerns semantic specifications instead of being limited to ad hoc functional relationships. As an advantage, our multi-agent model allows one to fit the behavior of real-world financial data. We exemplify the USD/DEM and YEN/DEM FX-Market simultaneously. Fitting real-world data, our approach is superior to more conventional forecasting techniques. Hans-Georg Zimmermann, Ralph Neuneier, Ralph Grothmann |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks | 2 |
| 2000 | Robust generation of symbolic prosody by a neural classifier based on autoassociatorsabstractIn this paper a highly robust method to predict symbolic prosody labels for speech synthesis is proposed. This method is based on a two stage approach. In the first stage the characteristics of each symbolic prosody label are captured by autoassociative models, which are trained independently. In the second stage detailed error information obtained from the different autoassociative models is used to train a neural classifier yielding class conditional probabilities. The method has been successfully applied for German and English language. For the latter the exact same data bases as used by Black and Taylor (1997) and Ostendorf and Veilleux (1994) were used to test the method. The results obtained are superior to those reported for the HMM-based and CART-based approaches. Further experiments also demonstrate considerable generalizing ability, yielding high robustness in sparse training material conditions. Achim F. Müller, Hans-Georg Zimmermann, Ralph Neuneier |
ICASSP | 3 |
| 2000 | Modeling of the German Yield Curve by Error Correction Neural Networks
Hans-Georg Zimmermann, Ralph Neuneier, Ralph Grothmann |
IDEAL | 2 |
| 1998 | Risk Sensitive Reinforcement Learning
Ralph Neuneier, Oliver Mihatsch |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1997 | Enhancing Q-Learning for Optimal Asset Allocation
Ralph Neuneier |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1997 | The Observer-Observation Dilemma in Neuro-Forecasting
Hans-Georg Zimmermann, Ralph Neuneier |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1997 | Non-parametric Data Selection for Neural Learning in Non-stationary Time Series
Gustavo Deco, Ralph Neuneier, Bernd Schürmann |
Neural Networks | 2 |
| 1996 | Experiments in predicting the German stock index DAX with density estimating neural networksabstractWe compare the performance of multilayer perceptrons and density estimating neural networks in the task of forecasting the return and the volatility of the DAX index. We claim that for nontrivial target distributions, density estimating networks should lead to improved predictions. The reason is that the latter are capable of embodying more complex probability models for the target noise. We discuss appropriate distribution assumptions for the important cases of outliers and non constant variances, and give interpretations of the new estimates in regression theory. Dirk Ormoneit, Ralph Neuneier |
CIFEr | 2 |
| 1996 | Early Brain Damage
Volker Tresp, Ralph Neuneier, Hans-Georg Zimmermann |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1995 | Optimal Asset Allocation using Adaptive Dynamic Programming
Ralph Neuneier |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1994 | Efficient Methods for Dealing with Missing Data in Supervised LearningabstractWe present efficient algorithms for dealing with the problem of mis(cid:173) sing inputs (incomplete feature vectors) during training and recall. Our approach is based on the approximation of the input data dis(cid:173) tribution using Parzen windows. For recall, we obtain closed form solutions for arbitrary feedforward networks. For training, we show how the backpropagation step for an incomplete pattern can be approximated by a weighted averaged backpropagation step. The complexity of the solutions for training and recall is independent of the number of missing features. We verify our theoretical results using one classification and one regression problem. Volker Tresp, Ralph Neuneier, Subutai Ahmad |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1993 | Training Neural Networks with Deficient Data
Volker Tresp, Subutai Ahmad, Ralph Neuneier |
NIPS | 3 |