Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Packer
dblp:56/5290
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 22% Segmentation and scene understanding · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Modeling Latent Variable Uncertainty for Loss-based Learning · ICML 2012 Self-Paced Learning for Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object localization |
0.2 | 3 | 2010 | Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2009 Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification · NIPS 2008 Self-Paced Learning for Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2010 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A combined pose, object, and feature model for action understanding · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › human action analysis
action understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A combined pose, object, and feature model for action understanding · CVPR 2012 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Modeling Latent Variable Uncertainty for Loss-based Learning · ICML 2012 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › biomedical image segmentation
cell segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A segmentation-aware object detection model with occlusion handling · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A segmentation-aware object detection model with occlusion handling · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A segmentation-aware object detection model with occlusion handling · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › robust object detection
occluded object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A segmentation-aware object detection model with occlusion handling · CVPR 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Self-Paced Learning for Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2010 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › binary segmentation
foreground-background segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A Unified Contour-Pixel Model for Figure-Ground Segmentation · ECCV (5) 2010 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Self-Paced Learning for Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › curriculum learning
self-paced learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Self-Paced Learning for Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › knowledge transfer
self-taught learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled data · ICML 2007 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled data · ICML 2007 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Self-Paced Learning for Latent Variable Models · NIPS 2010 |
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | A Unified Contour-Pixel Model for Figure-Ground Segmentation · ECCV (5) 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification · NIPS 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
figure-ground segmentation · 0.2contour-pixel model · 0.2pose tracking · 0.1object detection · 0.1latent variable modeling · 0.1structured output learning · 0.1inference · 0.1latent structural SVM · 0.1shape matching · 0.1landmark points · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | A combined pose, object, and feature model for action understandingabstractUnderstanding natural human activity involves not only identifying the action being performed, but also locating the semantic elements of the scene and describing the person's interaction with them. We present a system that is able to recognize complex, fine-grained human actions involving the manipulation of objects in realistic action sequences. Our method takes advantage of recent advances in sensors and pose trackers in learning an action model that draws on successful discriminative techniques while explicitly modeling both pose trajectories and object manipulations. By combining these elements in a single model, we are able to simultaneously recognize actions and track the location and manipulation of objects. To showcase this ability, we introduce a novel Cooking Action Dataset that contains video, depth readings, and pose tracks from a Kinect sensor. We show that our model outperforms existing state of the art techniques on this dataset as well as the VISINT dataset with only video sequences. Benjamin Packer, Kate Saenko, Daphne Koller |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2012 | Modeling Latent Variable Uncertainty for Loss-based Learning
M. Pawan Kumar, Benjamin Packer, Daphne Koller |
ICML | 2 |
| 2011 | A segmentation-aware object detection model with occlusion handlingabstractThe bounding box representation employed by many popular object detection models [3, 6] implicitly assumes all pixels inside the box belong to the object. This assumption makes this representation less robust to the object with occlusion [16]. In this paper, we augment the bounding box with a set of binary variables each of which corresponds to a cell indicating whether the pixels in the cell belong to the object. This segmentation-aware representation explicitly models and accounts for the supporting pixels for the object within the bounding box thus more robust to occlusion. We learn the model in a structured output framework, and develop a method that efficiently performs both inference and learning using this rich representation. The method is able to use segmentation reasoning to achieve improved detection results with richer output (cell level segmentation) on the Street Scenes and Pascal VOC 2007 datasets. Finally, we present a globally coherent object model using our rich representation to account for object-object occlusion resulting in a more coherent image understanding. Tianshi Gao, Benjamin Packer, Daphne Koller |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2010 | A Unified Contour-Pixel Model for Figure-Ground Segmentation
Benjamin Packer, Stephen Gould, Daphne Koller |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2010 | Self-Paced Learning for Latent Variable ModelsabstractLatent variable models are a powerful tool for addressing several tasks in machine learning. However, the algorithms for learning the parameters of latent variable models are prone to getting stuck in a bad local optimum. To alleviate this problem, we build on the intuition that, rather than considering all samples simultaneously, the algorithm should be presented with the training data in a meaningful order that facilitates learning. The order of the samples is determined by how easy they are. The main challenge is that often we are not provided with a readily computable measure of the easiness of samples. We address this issue by proposing a novel, iterative self-paced learning algorithm where each iteration simultaneously selects easy samples and learns a new parameter vector. The number of samples selected is governed by a weight that is annealed until the entire training data has been considered. We empirically demonstrate that the self-paced learning algorithm outperforms the state of the art method for learning a latent structural SVM on four applications: object localization, noun phrase coreference, motif finding and handwritten digit recognition. M. Pawan Kumar, Benjamin Packer, Daphne Koller |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2009 | Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification
Geremy Heitz, Gal Elidan, Benjamin Packer, Daphne Koller |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 3 |
| 2008 | Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive ClassificationabstractDiscriminative tasks, including object categorization and detection, are central components of high-level computer vision. Sometimes, however, we are interested in more refined aspects of the object in an image, such as pose or particular regions. In this paper we develop a method (LOOPS) for learning a shape and image feature model that can be trained on a particular object class, and used to outline instances of the class in novel images. Furthermore, while the training data consists of uncorresponded outlines, the resulting LOOPS model contains a set of landmark points that appear consistently across instances, and can be accurately localized in an image. Our model achieves state-of-the-art results in precisely outlining objects that exhibit large deformations and articulations in cluttered natural images. These localizations can then be used to address a range of tasks, including descriptive classification, search, and clustering. Geremy Heitz, Gal Elidan, Benjamin Packer, Daphne Koller |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2008 | Convex Point Estimation using Undirected Bayesian Transfer Hierarchies
Gal Elidan, Benjamin Packer, Geremy Heitz, Daphne Koller |
UAI | 2 |
| 2007 | Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled dataabstractWe present a new machine learning framework called "self-taught learning" for using unlabeled data in supervised classification tasks. We do not assume that the unlabeled data follows the same class labels or generative distribution as the labeled data. Thus, we would like to use a large number of unlabeled images (or audio samples, or text documents) randomly downloaded from the Internet to improve performance on a given image (or audio, or text) classification task. Such unlabeled data is significantly easier to obtain than in typical semi-supervised or transfer learning settings, making self-taught learning widely applicable to many practical learning problems. We describe an approach to self-taught learning that uses sparse coding to construct higher-level features using the unlabeled data. These features form a succinct input representation and significantly improve classification performance. When using an SVM for classification, we further show how a Fisher kernel can be learned for this representation. Rajat Raina, Alexis J. Battle, Honglak Lee, Benjamin Packer, Andrew Y. Ng |
ICML | 4 |