Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ramanan Navaratnam

dblp:56/6481 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 37% Face, body and person analysis · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › latent gaussian model
gaussian process latent variable model
0.112007
The Joint Manifold Model for Semi-supervised Multi-valued Regression · ICCV 2007
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
human pose estimation
0.112007
The Joint Manifold Model for Semi-supervised Multi-valued Regression · ICCV 2007
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning
0.112007
The Joint Manifold Model for Semi-supervised Multi-valued Regression · ICCV 2007
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking
0.112006
Multivariate Relevance Vector Machines for Tracking · ECCV (3) 2006
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › sparse bayesian learning
relevance vector machine
0.112006
Multivariate Relevance Vector Machines for Tracking · ECCV (3) 2006
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.012007
The Joint Manifold Model for Semi-supervised Multi-valued Regression · ICCV 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-supervised learning · 0.1gaussian process latent variable model · 0.1relevance vector machine · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Pose estimation and tracking using multivariate regression
Arasanathan Thayananthan, Ramanan Navaratnam, Björn Stenger, Philip Torr 0001, Roberto Cipolla
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2
2007 The Joint Manifold Model for Semi-supervised Multi-valued Regression
abstract
Many computer vision tasks may be expressed as the problem of learning a mapping between image space and a parameter space. For example, in human body pose estimation, recent research has directly modelled the mapping from image features (z) to joint angles (θ). Fitting such models requires training data in the form of labelled (zθ) pairs, from which are learned the conditional densities p(zθ). Inference is then simple: given test image featuresz, the conditional (zθ) is immediately computed. However large amounts of training data are required to fit the models, particularly in the case where the spaces are high dimensional. We show how the use of unlabelled data—samples from the marginal distributions p(z) and p(θ)—may be used to improve fitting. This is valuable because it is often significantly easier to obtain unlabelled than labelled samples. We use a Gaussian process latent variable model to learn the mapping from a shared latent low-dimensional manifold to the feature and parameter spaces. This extends existing approaches to (a) use unlabelled data, and (b) represent one-to-many mappings. Experiments on synthetic and real problems demonstrate how the use of unlabelled data improves over existing techniques. In our comparisons, we include existing approaches that are explicitly semi-supervised as well as those which implicitly make use of unlabelled examples.
Ramanan Navaratnam, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, Roberto Cipolla
ICCV1
2006 Semi-supervised Learning of Joint Density Models for Human Pose Estimation
abstract
Learning regression models (for example for body pose estimation, or BPE) currently requires large numbers of training examples—pairs of the form (image, pose parameters). These examples are difficult to obtain for many problems, demanding considerable effort in manual labelling. However it is easy to obtain unlabelled examples—in BPE, simply by collecting many images, and by sampling many poses using motion capture. We show how the use of unlabelled examples can improve the performance of such estimators, making better use of the difficult-to-obtain training examples. Because the distribution of parameters conditioned on a given image is often multimodal, conventional regression models must be extended to allow for multiple modes. Such extensions have to date had a pre-set number of modes, independent of the contents of the input image, and amount to fitting several regressors simultaneously. Our framework models instead the joint distribution of images and poses, so the conditional estimates are inherently multimodal, and the number of modes is a function of the joint-space complexity, rather than of the maximum number of output modes. We demonstrate the improvements obtainable by using unlabelled samples on synthetic examples and on a real pose estimation problem, and demonstrate in both cases the additional accuracy provided by the use of unlabelled data. 1
Ramanan Navaratnam, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, Roberto Cipolla
BMVC1
2006 Multivariate Relevance Vector Machines for Tracking
Arasanathan Thayananthan, Ramanan Navaratnam, Björn Stenger, Philip Torr 0001, Roberto Cipolla
ECCV (3)2
2005 Hierarchical Part-Based Human Body Pose Estimation
abstract
This paper addresses the problem of automatic detection and recovery of three-dimensional human body pose from monocular video sequences for HCI applications. We propose a new hierarchical part-based pose estimation method for the upper-body that efficiently searches the high dimensional articulation space. The body is treated as a collection of parts linked in a kinematic structure. Search for configurations of this collection is commenced from the most reliably detectable part. The rest of the parts are searched based on the detected locations of this anchor as they all are kinematically linked. Each part is represented by a set of 2D templates created from a 3D model, hence inherently encoding the 3D joint angles. The tree data structure is exploited to efficiently search through these templates. Multiple hypotheses are computed for each frame. By modelling these with a HMM, temporal coherence of body motion is exploited to find a smooth trajectory of articulation between frames using a modified Viterbi algorithm. Experimental results show that the proposed technique produces good estimates of the human 3D pose on a range of test videos in a cluttered environment.
Ramanan Navaratnam, Arasanathan Thayananthan, Philip Torr 0001, Roberto Cipolla
BMVC1
2004 Likelihood Models For Template Matching using the PDF Projection Theorem
abstract
Template matching techniques are widely used in many computer vision tasks. Generally, a likelihood value is calculated from similarity measures, however the relation between these measures and the data likelihood is often incorrectly stated. It is clear that accurate likelihood estimation will improve the efficiency of the matching algorithms. This paper introduces a novel method for estimating the likelihood PDFS accurately based on the PDF Projection Theorem, which provides the correct relation between the feature likelihood and the data likelihood, permitting the use of different types of features for different types of objects and still estimating consistent likelihoods. The proposed method removes the normalization and bias problems that are usually associated with the likelihood calculations. We demonstrate that it significantly improves template matching in pose estimation problems. Qualitative and quantitative results are compared against traditional likelihood estimation schemes.
Arasanathan Thayananthan, Ramanan Navaratnam, Philip Torr 0001, Roberto Cipolla
BMVC2