Similarly to other scientific domains, Deep Learning (DL) holds great promises to fulfil the challenging needs of Remote Sensing (RS) applications. However, the increase in volume, variety and complexity of acquisitions that are carried out on a daily basis by Earth Observation (EO) missions generates new processing and storage challenges within operational processing pipelines. The aim of this work is to show that High-Performance Computing (HPC) systems can speed up the training time of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Particular attention is put on the monitoring of the classification accuracy that usually degrades when using large batch sizes. The experimental results of this work show that the training of the model scales up to a batch size of 8,000, obtaining classification performances in terms of accuracy in line with those using smaller batch sizes.

Many libraries in the HPC field use sophisticated algorithms with clear theoretical scalability expectations. However, hardware constraints or programming bugs may sometimes render these expectations inaccurate or even plainly wrong. While algorithm and performance engineers have already been advocating the systematic combination of analytical performance models with practical measurements for a very long time, we go one step further and show how this comparison can become part of automated testing procedures. The most important applications of our method include initial validation, regression testing, and benchmarking to compare implementation and platform alternatives. Advancing the concept of performance assertions, we verify asymptotic scaling trends rather than precise analytical expressions, relieving the developer from the burden of having to specify and maintain very fine-grained and potentially non-portable expectations. In this way, scalability validation can be continuously applied throughout the whole development cycle with very little effort. Using MPI and parallel sorting algorithms as examples, we show how our method can help uncover non-obvious limitations of both libraries and underlying platforms.

Many libraries in the HPC field encapsulate sophisticated algorithms with clear theoretical scalability expectations. However, hardware constraints or programming bugs may sometimes render these expectations inaccurate or even plainly wrong. While algorithm engineers have already been advocating the systematic combination of analytical performance models with practical measurements for a very long time, we go one step further and show how this comparison can become part of automated testing procedures. The most important applications of our method include initial validation, regression testing, and benchmarking to compare implementation and platform alternatives. Advancing the concept of performance assertions, we verify asymptotic scaling trends rather than precise analytical expressions, relieving the developer from the burden of having to specify and maintain very fine grained and potentially non-portable expectations. In this way, scalability validation can be continuously applied throughout the whole development cycle with very little effort. Using MPI as an example, we show how our method can help uncover non-obvious limitations of both libraries and underlying platforms.