Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gordon F. Hughes
dblp:57/1840
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Storage systems · 100% Integrated circuit design · 0% Electronic design automation · 0% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 49% Learning paradigms · 49% Learning theory · 1% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › storage reliability
disk failure prediction |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Reliability and security of RAID storage systems and D2D archives using SATA disk drives · ACM Trans. Storage 2005 Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Failures in Hard Drives: A Multiple-Instance Application · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Failures in Hard Drives: A Multiple-Instance Application · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005 Reliability and security of RAID storage systems and D2D archives using SATA disk drives · ACM Trans. Storage 2005 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Failures in Hard Drives: A Multiple-Instance Application · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › class imbalance
rare category detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Failures in Hard Drives: A Multiple-Instance Application · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005 |
Storage systems
archival storage |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Reliability and security of RAID storage systems and D2D archives using SATA disk drives · ACM Trans. Storage 2005 |
Storage systems › storage reliability
RAID |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Reliability and security of RAID storage systems and D2D archives using SATA disk drives · ACM Trans. Storage 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multiple instance learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Failures in Hard Drives: A Multiple-Instance Application · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network › bayesian network classifiers
naive bayes |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Failures in Hard Drives: A Multiple-Instance Application · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
classifier design |
0.0 | 1 | 1969 | Number of pattern classifier design samples per class (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1969 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
boolean function realization |
0.0 | 1 | 1967 | Feed-Forward Threshold Logic Nets for Digital Switching and Pattern Recognition · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1967 |
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 1967 | Feed-Forward Threshold Logic Nets for Digital Switching and Pattern Recognition · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1967 |
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
threshold logic |
0.0 | 1 | 1967 | Feed-Forward Threshold Logic Nets for Digital Switching and Pattern Recognition · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1967 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
support vector machine · 0.2rank-sum test · 0.2naive bayes · 0.2clustering · 0.2multiple instance learning · 0.1reliability modeling · 0.1multiple-instance learning · 0.1failure analysis · 0.1feed-forward threshold logic nets · 0.0adaptive procedure · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Failures in Hard Drives: A Multiple-Instance ApplicationabstractWe compare machine learning methods applied to a difficult real-world problem: predicting computer hard-drive failure using attributes monitored internally by individual drives. The problem is one of detecting rare events in a time series of noisy and nonparametrically-distributed data. We develop a new algorithm based on the multiple-instance learning framework and the naive Bayesian classifier (mi-NB) which is specifically designed for the low false-alarm case, and is shown to have promising performance. Other methods compared are support vector machines (SVMs), unsupervised clustering, and non-parametric statistical tests (rank-sum and reverse arrangements). The failure-prediction performance of the SVM, rank-sum and mi-NB algorithm is considerably better than the threshold method currently implemented in drives, while maintaining low false alarm rates. Our results suggest that nonparametric statistical tests should be considered for learning problems involving detecting rare events in time series data. An appendix details the calculation of rank-sum significance probabilities in the case of discrete, tied observations, and we give new recommendations about when the exact calculation should be used instead of the commonly-used normal approximation. These normal approximations may be particularly inaccurate for rare event problems like hard drive failures. Joseph F. Murray, Gordon F. Hughes, Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2005 | Reliability and security of RAID storage systems and D2D archives using SATA disk drivesabstractInformation storage reliability and security is addressed by using personal computer disk drives in enterprise-class nearline and archival storage systems. The low cost of these serial ATA (SATA) PC drives is a tradeoff against drive reliability design and demonstration test levels, which are higher in the more expensive SCSI and Fibre Channel drives. This article discusses the tradeoff between SATA which has the advantage that fewer higher capacity drives are needed for a given system storage capacity, which further reduces cost and allows higher drive failure rates, and the use of additional storage system redundancy and drive failure prediction to maintain system data integrity using less reliable drives. RAID stripe failure probability is calculated using typical ATA and SCSI drive failure rates, for single and double parity data reconstruction failure, and failure due to drive unrecoverable block errors. Reliability improvement from drive failure prediction is also calculated, and can be significant. Today's SATA drive specifications for unrecoverable block errors appear to allow stripe reconstruction failure, and additional in-drive parity blocks are suggested as a solution. The possibility of using low cost disks data for backup and archiving is discussed, replacing higher cost magnetic tape. This requires significantly better RAID stripe failure probability, and suitable drive technology alternatives are discussed. The failure rate of nonoperating drives is estimated using failure analysis results from ≈4000 drives. Nonoperating RAID stripe failure rates are thereby estimated. User data security needs to be assured in addition to reliability, and to extend past the point where physical control of drives is lost, such as when drives are removed from systems for data vaulting, repair, sale, or discard. Today, over a third of resold drives contain unerased user data. Security is proposed via the existing SATA drive secure-erase command, or via the existing SATA drive password commands, or by data encryption. Finally, backup and archival disc storage is compared to magnetic tape, a technology with a proven reliability record over the full half-century of digital data storage. In contrast, tape archives are not vulnerable to tape transport failure modes. Only failure modes in the archived tapes and reels will make data unrecoverable. Gordon F. Hughes, Joseph F. Murray |
ACM Trans. Storage | 1 |
| 2002 | Improved disk-drive failure warningsabstractImproved methods are proposed for disk-drive failure prediction. The SMART (self monitoring and reporting technology) failure prediction system is currently implemented in disk-drives. Its purpose is to predict the near-term failure of an individual hard disk-drive, and issue a backup warning to prevent data loss. Two experimental tests of SMART show only moderate accuracy at low false-alarm rates. (A rate of 0.2% of total drives per year implies that 20% of drive returns would be good drives, relative to /spl ap/1% annual failure rate of drives). This requirement for very low false-alarm rates is well known in medical diagnostic tests for rare diseases, and methodology used there suggests ways to improve SMART. Two improved SMART algorithms are proposed. They use the SMART internal drive attribute measurements in present drives. The present warning-algorithm based on maximum error thresholds is replaced by distribution-free statistical hypothesis tests. These improved algorithms are computationally simple enough to be implemented in drive microprocessor firmware code. They require only integer sort operations to put several hundred attribute values in rank order. Some tens of these ranks are added up and the SMART warning is issued if the sum exceeds a prestored limit. These new algorithms were tested on 3744 drives of 2 models. They gave 3-4 times higher correct prediction accuracy than error thresholds on will-fail drives, at 0.2% false-alarm rate. The highest accuracies achievable are modest (40%-60%). Care was taken to test will-fail drive prediction accuracy on data independent of the algorithm design data. Additional work is needed to verify and apply these algorithms in actual drive design. They can also be useful in drive failure analysis engineering. It might be possible to screen drives in manufacturing using SMART attributes. Marginal drives might be detected before substantial final test time is invested in them, thereby decreasing manufacturing cost, and possibly decreasing overall field failure rates. Gordon F. Hughes, Joseph F. Murray, Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado, Charles Elkan |
IEEE Trans. Reliab. | 1 |
| 1969 | Number of pattern classifier design samples per class (Corresp.)
Gordon F. Hughes |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 1967 | Feed-Forward Threshold Logic Nets for Digital Switching and Pattern RecognitionabstractA computer-programmable algorithm is presented for the design of general feed-forward nets of threshold logic gates, which realize arbitrary digital switching functions. The algorithm is proved to be convergent for all switching functions. A simplified version of the algorithm is presented for the case of symmetric switching functions. Both algorithms are proved minimal for single-gate nets; a necessary condition is given for the symmetric algorithm to produce minimal two-gate nets when they exist; and two-gate minimality is also demonstrated for the general algorithm, for a certain class of two-gate switching functions. However, general minimality is not proved. The case of partially defined switching functions is treated. Minor alterations in the general algorithm allow its use as an adaptive pattern recognition procedure, where the input variables represent real numbers rather than Boolean variables. Experimental restults are presented for both digital switching-function realization and analog pattern recognition. Gordon F. Hughes |
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 1 |