Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xianhua Jiang
dblp:57/356
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Accelerated Kernel Feature Analysis · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Accelerated Kernel Feature Analysis · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Algorithms and data structures › kernel methods
kernel principal component analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Accelerated Kernel Feature Analysis · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance maximization · 0.1mercer kernel · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | On the Geometry of Covariance MatricesabstractWe introduce and compare certain distance measures between covariance matrices. These originate in information theory, quantum mechanics and optimal transport. More specifically, we show that the Bures/Hellinger distance between covariance matrices coincides with the Wasserstein-2 distance between the corresponding Gaussian distributions. We also note that this Bures/Hellinger/Wasserstein distance can be expressed as the solution to a linear matrix inequality (LMI). A consequence of this fact is that the computational cost in covariance approximation problems scales nicely with the size of the matrices involved. We discuss the relevance of this metric in spectral-line detection and spectral morphing. Lipeng Ning, Xianhua Jiang, Tryphon T. Georgiou |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 2 |
| 2006 | Accelerated Kernel Feature AnalysisabstractA fast algorithm, Accelerated Kernel Feature Analysis (AKFA), that discovers salient features evidenced in a sample of n unclassified patterns, is presented. Like earlier kernel-based feature selection algorithms, AKFA implicitly embeds each pattern into a Hilbert space, H, induced by a Mercer kernel. An \ell-dimensional linear subspace of H is iteratively constructed by maximizing a variance condition for the nonlinearly transformed sample. This linear subspace can then be used to define more efficient data representations and pattern classifiers. AKFA requires O(\elln2) operations, as compared to 0(n^3) for Sch¨olkof, Smola, and M¨uller’s Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA), and O(\ell^2 n^2) for Smola, Mangasarian, and Sch¨olkopf’s Sparse Kernel Feature Analysis (SKFA). Numerical experiments show that AKFA can generate more concise feature representations than both KPCA and SKFA, and demonstrate that AKFA obtains similar classification performance as KPCA for a face recognition problem. Xianhua Jiang, Yuichi Motai, Robert R. Snapp, Xingquan Zhu 0001 |
CVPR (1) | 1 |