Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ana Busic

dblp:57/3580 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4133-3739ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 7 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 78% Learning theory · 15% Motion planning and robot control · 7%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Mathematical optimization · 25% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.812024
WFCRL: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Wind Farm Control · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.812024
WFCRL: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Wind Farm Control · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.812024
Reinforcement Learning and Regret Bounds for Admission Control · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
function approximation
0.412020
Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
non-linear function approximation
0.412020
Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning
0.412020
Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning
0.412020
Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
constrained markov decision process
0.312018
Action-Constrained Markov Decision Processes With Kullback-Leibler Cost · COLT 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.312018
Action-Constrained Markov Decision Processes With Kullback-Leibler Cost · COLT 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimal control
0.312018
Action-Constrained Markov Decision Processes With Kullback-Leibler Cost · COLT 2018
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.212024
Reinforcement Learning and Regret Bounds for Admission Control · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.212015
Speeding up Glauber Dynamics for Random Generation of Independent Sets · SIGMETRICS 2015
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling › markov chain monte carlo
glauber dynamics
0.212015
Speeding up Glauber Dynamics for Random Generation of Independent Sets · SIGMETRICS 2015
Graph algorithms and graph theory › independent set
maximum independent set
0.212015
Speeding up Glauber Dynamics for Random Generation of Independent Sets · SIGMETRICS 2015
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms
0.212015
Speeding up Glauber Dynamics for Random Generation of Independent Sets · SIGMETRICS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transfer learning · 1.5regret analysis · 1.5multi-agent reinforcement learning · 1.5UCRL2 · 1.5stochastic approximation · 0.4neural network function approximation · 0.4kullback-leibler divergence · 0.3eigenvector method · 0.3markov chain monte carlo · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 COGNAC: Cooperative Graph-based Networked Agent Challenges for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Many controlled complex systems have an inherent network structure, such as power grids, traffic light systems, or computer networks. Automatically controlling these systems is highly challenging due to their combinatorial complexity. Standard single-agent reinforcement learning (RL) approaches often struggle with the curse of dimensionality in such settings. In contrast, the multi-agent paradigm offers a promising solution by distributing decision-making, thereby addressing both algorithmic and combinatorial challenges. In this paper, we introduce COGNAC (COoperative Graph-based Networked Agent Challenges), a collection of cooperative graph-structured environments designed to facilitate experiments across different graph sizes and topologies. COGNAC bridges the gap between theoretical research in network control and practical multi-agent RL (MARL) applications by offering a flexible, scalable platform with a suite of simple yet highly challenging problems rooted in networked environments. Our benchmarks also support the development and evaluation of decentralized and distributed learning algorithms, motivated by the growing interest in more sustainable and frugal AI systems. Experiments on COGNAC show that independent actor–critic learning (IPPO) yields the highest-quality joint policies while scaling robustly to large network sizes with minimal hyperparameter tuning. Value-based independent learning (IDQL) typically needs substantially more training and is less reliable on combinatorial tasks. In contrast, standard Centralized-Training Decentralized-Execution (CTDE) methods and fully centralized training are slower to converge, less stable, and struggle to generalize to larger, more interdependent networks. These results suggest that CTDE approaches likely need extra information or inter-agent communication to fully capture the underlying network structure of each problem.
Jules Sintes, Ana Busic
NeurIPS2
2024 Reinforcement Learning and Regret Bounds for Admission Control
abstract
The expected regret of any reinforcement learning algorithm is lower bounded by $\Omega\left(\sqrt{DXAT}\right)$ for undiscounted returns, where $D$ is the diameter of the Markov decision process, $X$ the size of the state space, $A$ the size of the action space and $T$ the number of time steps. However, this lower bound is general. A smaller regret can be obtained by taking into account some specific knowledge of the problem structure. In this article, we consider an admission control problem to an $M/M/c/S$ queue with $m$ job classes and class-dependent rewards and holding costs. Queuing systems often have a diameter that is exponential in the buffer size $S$, making the previous lower bound prohibitive for any practical use. We propose an algorithm inspired by UCRL2, and use the structure of the problem to upper bound the expected total regret by $O(S\log T + \sqrt{mT \log T})$ in the finite server case. In the infinite server case, we prove that the dependence of the regret on $S$ disappears.
Lucas Weber, Ana Busic, Jiamin Zhu
ICML2
2024 WFCRL: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Wind Farm Control
abstract
The wind farm control problem is challenging, since conventional model-based control strategies require tractable models of complex aerodynamical interactions between the turbines and suffer from the curse of dimension when the number of turbines increases. Recently, model-free and multi-agent reinforcement learning approaches have been used to address this challenge. In this article, we introduce WFCRL (Wind Farm Control with Reinforcement Learning), the first suite of multi-agent reinforcement learning environments for the wind farm control problem. WFCRL frames a cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) problem: each turbine is an agent and can learn to adjust its yaw, pitch or torque to maximize the common objective (e.g. the total power production of the farm). WFCRL also offers turbine load observations that will allow to optimize the farm performance while limiting turbine structural damages. Interfaces with two state-of-the-art farm simulators are implemented in WFCRL: a static simulator (Floris) and a dynamic simulator (FAST.farm). For each simulator, $10$ wind layouts are provided, including $5$ real wind farms. Two state-of-the-art online MARL algorithms are implemented to illustrate the scaling challenges. As learning online on FAST.Farm is highly time-consuming, WFCRL offers the possibility of designing transfer learning strategies from Floris to FAST.Farm.
Claire Bizon Monroc, Ana Busic, Donatien Dubuc, Jiamin Zhu
NeurIPS2
2024 Dynamic load balancing in energy packet networks
abstract
Energy Packet Networks (EPNs) model the interaction between renewable sources generating energy following a random process and communication devices that consume energy. This network is formed by cells and, in each cell, there is a queue that handles energy packets and another queue that handles data packets. We assume Poisson arrivals of energy packets and of data packets to all the cells and exponential service times. We consider an EPN model with a dynamic load balancing where a cell without data packets can poll other cells to migrate jobs. This migration can only take place when there is enough energy in both interacting cells, in which case a batch of data packets is transferred and the required energy is consumed (i.e. it disappears). We consider that data packet also consume energy to be routed to the next station. Our main result shows that the steady-state distribution of jobs in the queues admits a product form solution provided that a stable solution of a fixed point equation exists. We prove sufficient conditions for irreducibility. Under these conditions and when the fixed point equation has a solution, the Markov chain is ergodic. We also provide sufficient conditions for the existence of a solution of the fixed point equation. We then focus on layered networks and we study the polling rates that must be set to achieve a fair load balancing, i.e., such that, in the same layer, the load of the queues handling data packets is the same. Our numerical experiments illustrate that dynamic load balancing satisfies several interesting properties such as performance improvement or fair load balancing.
Ana Busic, Josu Doncel, Jean-Michel Fourneau
Perform. Evaluation1
2022 Analysis of an optimal policy in dynamic bipartite matching models
abstract
A dynamic bipartite matching model is given by a bipartite matching graph which determines the possible matchings between the various types of supply and demand items. Both supply and demand items arrive to the system according to a stochastic process. Matched pairs leave the system and the others wait in the queues, which induces a holding cost. We model this problem as a Markov Decision Process and study the discounted cost and the average cost problem. We assume that the cost function is linear on the queue sizes. We show that for the N-shaped matching graph, an optimal matching control prioritizes the matchings in the pendant edges and is of threshold type for the diagonal edge. In addition, for the average cost problem, we compute the optimal threshold value. We then show how the obtained results can be used to characterize the structure of an optimal matching control for a quasi-complete graph with an arbitrary number of nodes. For arbitrary bipartite graphs, we show that, when the cost of the pendant edges is larger than in the neighbors, an optimal matching policy prioritizes the items in the pendant edges. We also study the W-shaped matching graph and, when the cost of the pendant edges is larger than the cost of the middle edge, we conjecture that an optimal matching policy is also of threshold type with priority to the pendant edges; however, when the cost of the middle edge is larger, we present simulations that show that it is not optimal to prioritize items in the pendant edges.
Arnaud Cadas, Josu Doncel, Ana Busic
Perform. Evaluation3
2021 Multiclass Energy Packet Networks with finite capacity energy queues
abstract
Energy Packet Network (EPN) consists of a queueing network formed by N blocks, where each of them is formed by one data queue, that handles the workload, and one energy queue, that handles packets of energy. We study an EPN model where the energy packets start the transfer. In this model, energy packets are sent to the data queue of the same block. An energy packet routes one workload packet to the next block if the data queue is not empty, and it is lost otherwise. We assume that the energy queues have a finite buffer size and if an energy packet arrives to the system when the buffer is full, jump-over blocking (JOB) is performed, and therefore with some probability it is sent to the data queue and it is lost otherwise. We first provide a value of the jump-over blocking probability such that the steady-state probability distribution of packets in the queues admits a product form solution. The product form is established for multiserver and multiclass data packet queues under FCFS, preemptive LCFS and PS discipline. Moreover, in the case of a directed tree queueing network, we show that the number of data packets in each subtree decreases as the JOB probability increases for each block.
Sébastien Samain, Josu Doncel, Ana Busic, Jean-Michel Fourneau
Perform. Evaluation3
2020 Explicit Mean-Square Error Bounds for Monte-Carlo and Linear Stochastic Approximation
abstract
This paper concerns error bounds for recursive equations subject to Markovian disturbances. Motivating examples abound within the fields of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), and many of these algorithms can be interpreted as special cases of stochastic approximation (SA). It is argued that it is not possible in general to obtain a Hoeffding bound on the error sequence, even when the underlying Markov chain is reversible and geometrically ergodic, such as the M/M/1 queue. This is motivation for the focus on mean square error bounds for parameter estimates. It is shown that mean square error achieves the optimal rate of $O(1/n)$, subject to conditions on the step-size sequence. Moreover, the exact constants in the rate are obtained, which is of great value in algorithm design.
Adithya M. Devraj, Ana Busic, Sean P. Meyn
AISTATS3
2020 Zap Q-Learning With Nonlinear Function Approximation
abstract
Zap Q-learning is a recent class of reinforcement learning algorithms, motivated primarily as a means to accelerate convergence. Stability theory has been absent outside of two restrictive classes: the tabular setting, and optimal stopping. This paper introduces a new framework for analysis of a more general class of recursive algorithms known as stochastic approximation. Based on this general theory, it is shown that Zap Q-learning is consistent under a non-degeneracy assumption, even when the function approximation architecture is nonlinear. Zap Q-learning with neural network function approximation emerges as a special case, and is tested on examples from OpenAI Gym. Based on multiple experiments with a range of neural network sizes, it is found that the new algorithms converge quickly and are robust to choice of function approximation architecture.
Adithya M. Devraj, Ana Busic, Sean P. Meyn
NeurIPS4
2018 Action-Constrained Markov Decision Processes With Kullback-Leibler Cost
abstract
This paper concerns computation of optimal policies in which the one-step reward function contains a cost term that models Kullback-Leibler divergence with respect to nominal dynamics. This technique was introduced by Todorov in 2007, where it was shown under general conditions that the solution to the average-reward optimality equations reduce to a simple eigenvector problem. Since then many authors have sought to apply this technique to control problems and models of bounded rationality in economics. A crucial assumption is that the input process is essentially unconstrained. For example, if the nominal dynamics include randomness from nature (e.g., the impact of wind on a moving vehicle), then the optimal control solution does not respect the exogenous nature of this disturbance. This paper introduces a technique to solve a more general class of action-constrained MDPs. The main idea is to solve an entire parameterized family of MDPs, in which the parameter is a scalar weighting the one-step reward function. The approach is new and practical even in the original unconstrained formulation.
Ana Busic, Sean P. Meyn
COLT1
2016 Low complexity state space representation and algorithms for closed queueing networks exact sampling
Anne Bouillard, Ana Busic, Christelle Rovetta
Perform. Evaluation2
2015 Speeding up Glauber Dynamics for Random Generation of Independent Sets
abstract
The maximum independent set (MIS) problem is a well-studied combinatorial optimization problem that naturally arises in many applications, such as wireless communication, information theory and statistical mechanics.
Rémi Varloot, Ana Busic, Anne Bouillard
SIGMETRICS2
2014 Perfect sampling for closed queueing networks
Anne Bouillard, Ana Busic, Christelle Rovetta
Perform. Evaluation2
2012 Density Classification on Infinite Lattices and Trees
Ana Busic, Nazim Fatès, Jean Mairesse, Irène Marcovici
LATIN1
2012 Perfect sampling of Markov chains with piecewise homogeneous events
Ana Busic, Bruno Gaujal, Furcy Pin
Perform. Evaluation1
2011 Probabilistic cellular automata, invariant measures, and perfect sampling
Ana Busic, Jean Mairesse, Irène Marcovici
STACS1